MPlayer vs Windows Media Player

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MPlayer icon

MPlayer

MPlayer is a highly versatile, free, and open-source multimedia player renowned for its extensive codec support and powerful command-line interface. It can handle a wide array of media formats with minimal system resources. by The MPlayer Team

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD AmigaOS Xfce MorphOS
Screenshots:
VS
Windows Media Player icon

Windows Media Player

Windows Media Player is a built-in multimedia player and manager for Windows, enabling users to play audio, video, and view images. It also provides functionalities for Rip and burn CDs and synchronize media to portable devices. by Microsoft

Free
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

MPlayer and Windows Media Player are both powerful solutions in their space. MPlayer offers mplayer is a highly versatile, free, and open-source multimedia player renowned for its extensive codec support and powerful command-line interface. it can handle a wide array of media formats with minimal system resources., while Windows Media Player provides windows media player is a built-in multimedia player and manager for windows, enabling users to play audio, video, and view images. it also provides functionalities for rip and burn cds and synchronize media to portable devices.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MPlayer

MPlayer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Exceptional codec support out-of-the-box.
Highly efficient and lightweight on system resources.
Powerful and flexible command-line interface for advanced control.
Supports a wide range of media formats and sources.
Ad-free and open-source.

Limitations

Command-line interface can be intimidating for new users.
Graphical interface options are often less polished than modern players.
Windows Media Player

Windows Media Player

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Bundled with Windows, no separate installation needed.
Good for basic playback and media organization.
Includes CD ripping and burning capabilities.
Generally stable and light on system resources for basic use.

Limitations

User interface can feel dated compared to newer players.
Limited support for newer or less common media formats without extra codecs.
Advanced features are not always intuitive to find.
Features for online media streaming are less prominent in newer versions.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare