Multi Commander vs Thunar

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Multi Commander icon

Multi Commander

Multi Commander is a feature-rich, multi-tabbed file manager designed as a powerful alternative to standard Windows Explorer. It provides enhanced file management capabilities, extensive customization options, and supports a wide range of plugins and extensions. by Mathias Svensson

Free
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the Xfce desktop environment and other Unix-like systems. Designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins. by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Multi Commander and Thunar are both powerful solutions in their space. Multi Commander offers multi commander is a feature-rich, multi-tabbed file manager designed as a powerful alternative to standard windows explorer. it provides enhanced file management capabilities, extensive customization options, and supports a wide range of plugins and extensions., while Thunar provides thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the xfce desktop environment and other unix-like systems. designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Multi Commander

Multi Commander

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Efficient dual-pane and multi-tabbed interface
Extensive features and customization options
Strong support for plugins, including Total Commander plugins
Includes useful built-in tools like viewers and batch renamer
Available as a portable application

Limitations

Can have a steeper learning curve compared to simple file explorers
Interface might feel overwhelming initially due to numerous options
Thunar

Thunar

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Simple and intuitive user interface
Powerful batch renamer included
Highly extensible through a plugin system
Low resource consumption

Limitations

Core features are intentionally basic, relying on plugins for advanced functionality
Limited built-in support for some network protocols (e.g., FTP) compared to other file managers

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare