Openbox vs awesome

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Openbox icon

Openbox

Openbox is a highly configurable and lightweight stacking window manager for the X Window System. It's designed for speed and efficiency, allowing users to fully customize their desktop environment without the bloat of full desktop environments like GNOME or KDE. by Dana Jansens

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
awesome icon

awesome

awesome is a highly customizable, next-generation tiling window manager for the X Window System. It focuses on providing a highly efficient workflow for developers and power users through extensive configurability and a powerful API.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Openbox and awesome are both powerful solutions in their space. Openbox offers openbox is a highly configurable and lightweight stacking window manager for the x window system. it's designed for speed and efficiency, allowing users to fully customize their desktop environment without the bloat of full desktop environments like gnome or kde., while awesome provides awesome is a highly customizable, next-generation tiling window manager for the x window system. it focuses on providing a highly efficient workflow for developers and power users through extensive configurability and a powerful api.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Openbox

Openbox

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and resource-efficient.
Highly customizable through configuration files.
Fast and responsive performance.
Ideal for older hardware and resource-constrained systems.
Enables a keyboard-centric workflow.
Modular design allows integration with other tools.

Limitations

Steep learning curve for configuration.
Requires manual editing of configuration files.
No built-in graphical tools for most settings.
Requires integrating external components for a complete desktop experience.
awesome

awesome

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely customizable via Lua scripting.
Highly efficient for users who prefer keyboard control.
Lightweight and resource-friendly.
Excellent for managing multiple windows and tasks.
Flexible tag-based workspace management.

Limitations

Steep learning curve requires time and effort to configure.
Configuration is done via text files (Lua), no graphical tools are included by default.
Relies heavily on keyboard shortcuts, which need to be learned.
Documentation can be dispersed.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare