p7zip vs File Roller Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

p7zip icon

p7zip

p7zip is the command-line port of the powerful 7-Zip archiver, offering high compression ratios and support for numerous archive formats via a robust command-line interface. It's ideal for scripting, automation, and users who prefer terminal-based operations for file archiving and extraction.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Linux BSD Haiku
VS
File Roller icon

File Roller

File Roller is the official archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. It supports a wide range of popular archive formats. by Paolo Bacchilega

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Linux GNOME

Summary

p7zip and File Roller are both powerful solutions in their space. p7zip offers p7zip is the command-line port of the powerful 7-zip archiver, offering high compression ratios and support for numerous archive formats via a robust command-line interface. it's ideal for scripting, automation, and users who prefer terminal-based operations for file archiving and extraction., while File Roller provides file roller is the official archive manager for the gnome desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. it supports a wide range of popular archive formats.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

p7zip

p7zip

Pros

  • Offers superior compression ratio, especially with 7z format.
  • Ideal for scripting and automation.
  • Supports a wide range of archive formats.
  • Provides strong AES-256 encryption.
  • Cross-platform compatibility.

Cons

  • Requires command-line knowledge.
  • No graphical user interface.
  • Can have a learning curve for new users.
  • RAR support is limited to extraction.
File Roller

File Roller

Pros

  • Excellent integration with GNOME desktop.
  • Simple and intuitive user interface.
  • Supports a wide range of common archive formats.
  • Easy to use for basic compression and extraction.
  • Lightweight and resource-efficient.

Cons

  • Lacks advanced features found in specialized archiving software.
  • Limited options for fine-tuning compression settings.
  • May not support all niche archive formats.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare