Pulseway vs Icinga Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Pulseway icon

Pulseway

Pulseway is a comprehensive real-time IT monitoring and management software solution designed for modern IT teams and MSPs, accessible from anywhere via mobile or web. by mobilepcmonitor

Commercial
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows Linux Android iPhone Blackberry Windows RT Android Tablet Windows Phone iPad
VS
Icinga icon

Icinga

Icinga is a powerful open-source monitoring system that helps organizations keep track of the health and performance of their IT infrastructure, including networks, servers, and applications.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Linux

Summary

Pulseway and Icinga are both powerful solutions in their space. Pulseway offers pulseway is a comprehensive real-time it monitoring and management software solution designed for modern it teams and msps, accessible from anywhere via mobile or web., while Icinga provides icinga is a powerful open-source monitoring system that helps organizations keep track of the health and performance of their it infrastructure, including networks, servers, and applications.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Pulseway

Pulseway

Pros

  • Excellent mobile application for on-the-go management.
  • Real-time monitoring provides immediate insights.
  • Comprehensive remote control capabilities.
  • Effective IT automation features to streamline tasks.
  • Supports multiple operating systems.
  • Customizable dashboards for personalized views.

Cons

  • Network monitoring is less deep than dedicated tools.
  • Initial learning curve for the web console due to extensive features.
  • Pricing model might need careful consideration for scaling environments.
Icinga

Icinga

Pros

  • Highly scalable and supports distributed environments.
  • Flexible and extensible with a large plugin ecosystem.
  • Modern and user-friendly web interface.
  • Powerful API for integration and automation.
  • Active open-source community and ample documentation.

Cons

  • Initial configuration can be complex for beginners.
  • Requires dedicated resources for larger deployments.
  • Relies on external components for advanced graphing (though integrations are good).

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare