PerformanceTest vs Furmark : Which is Better?

PerformanceTest icon

PerformanceTest

PerformanceTest is a benchmarking tool. Developed by PassMark Software

License: Commercial

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Windows

VS
VS
Furmark icon

Furmark

FurMark is a very intensive OpenGL benchmark that uses fur rendering algorithms to measure the performance of the graphics card. Developed by Jerome 'JeGX' GUINOT

License: Free

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Windows

PerformanceTest VS Furmark

PerformanceTest offers a more comprehensive suite of performance testing tools for both CPUs and GPUs, making it suitable for a wider range of hardware evaluations. In contrast, Furmark specializes in extreme GPU stress testing, providing detailed graphical feedback specifically for graphics cards, making it ideal for gamers and overclockers.

PerformanceTest

Pros:

  • Comprehensive performance testing for CPUs and GPUs
  • User-friendly interface for easy navigation
  • Supports multiple benchmarking tests
  • Provides detailed reports and logs
  • Customizable testing parameters
  • Real-time monitoring of performance metrics
  • Compatible with various hardware configurations
  • Allows for automated testing scenarios
  • Supports stress testing for stability analysis
  • Easy integration with other testing tools

Cons:

  • Limited to performance testing only
  • May require advanced knowledge for optimal results
  • Not suitable for casual users
  • Can be resource-intensive during testing
  • Results may vary based on system configuration

Furmark

Pros:

  • Highly efficient in benchmarking GPU performance
  • Focuses on extreme stress testing for graphics cards
  • Offers a variety of rendering tests
  • Includes a built-in benchmarking score system
  • User adjustable settings for resolution and quality
  • Real-time frame rate monitoring
  • Provides detailed graphical feedback
  • Supports multiple APIs including DirectX and OpenGL
  • Can run in fullscreen or windowed mode
  • Widely used in the gaming community

Cons:

  • Primarily focuses on GPU performance, less on CPU
  • May not provide in-depth analysis for non-GPU components
  • Can produce misleading results if not configured correctly

Compare PerformanceTest

vs
Compare AIDA64 and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Belarc Advisor and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Cinebench and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CPU-Z and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CrystalDiskMark and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Geekbench and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GPU-Z and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Hardinfo and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Hardware Lister and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Novabench and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PC Wizard and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare SiSoftware Sandra and PerformanceTest and decide which is most suitable for you.