PhotoQt vs Eye of GNOME : Which is Better?

PhotoQt icon

PhotoQt

PhotoQt is a simple, yet powerful and good looking image viewer, written in C++/Qt, published as open-source, and completely free. Developed by Lukas Spies

License: Open Source

Categories: Photos & Graphics

Apps available for Windows Linux

VS
VS
Eye of GNOME icon

Eye of GNOME

Eye of GNOME is the official image viewer for the GNOME desktop environment, where it is also known as Image Viewer. Developed by The GNOME Project

License: Open Source

Categories: Photos & Graphics

Apps available for Linux

PhotoQt VS Eye of GNOME

PhotoQt offers a robust feature set with extensive customization options and editing tools, making it suitable for power users and those needing advanced functionality. In contrast, Eye of GNOME is a simpler, user-friendly image viewer that integrates well within the GNOME desktop environment but lacks advanced features.

PhotoQt

Pros:

  • Supports a wide range of image formats
  • Highly customizable interface
  • Includes built-in photo editing tools
  • Efficient batch processing capabilities
  • Cross-platform availability
  • Active community support
  • Fast and lightweight performance
  • Extension support for added functionality
  • Good keyboard shortcut support
  • Integrates well with other applications

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for new users due to many features
  • Some advanced features may require learning curve
  • Limited support for certain niche image formats
  • Not as integrated into specific desktop environments
  • May lack some advanced image management features

Eye of GNOME

Pros:

  • Simple and user-friendly interface
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Open source with a supportive community
  • Good performance with large images
  • Integrated with GNOME desktop environment
  • Basic image viewing capabilities
  • Minimal resource usage
  • Supports most common image formats
  • Easy access to metadata

Cons:

  • Limited editing features
  • Fewer customization options
  • No batch processing capabilities
  • Not cross-platform
  • Less extensible compared to other image viewers
  • Basic functionality may not suffice for advanced users
  • Integration is primarily focused on GNOME
  • Limited image viewing modes

Compare PhotoQt

vs
Compare ACDSee and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FastStone Image Viewer and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GPicView and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare gThumb and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Gwenview and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ImageGlass and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare IrfanView and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare JPEGView and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Mirage and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Mylio and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Nomacs and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Ristretto and PhotoQt and decide which is most suitable for you.