PowerArchiver vs File Roller

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

PowerArchiver icon

PowerArchiver

PowerArchiver is a powerful and versatile file archiver and compression utility for Windows, offering extensive support for a wide range of archive formats, robust encryption, and seamless integration with the Windows shell and cloud services. by ConeXware, Inc.

Commercial
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
File Roller icon

File Roller

File Roller is the official archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. It supports a wide range of popular archive formats. by Paolo Bacchilega

Open Source
Platforms: Linux GNOME
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

PowerArchiver and File Roller are both powerful solutions in their space. PowerArchiver offers powerarchiver is a powerful and versatile file archiver and compression utility for windows, offering extensive support for a wide range of archive formats, robust encryption, and seamless integration with the windows shell and cloud services., while File Roller provides file roller is the official archive manager for the gnome desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. it supports a wide range of popular archive formats.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

PowerArchiver

PowerArchiver

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a vast number of archive formats.
Strong AES-256 bit encryption for secure archiving.
Excellent integration with Windows Explorer.
Includes a convenient built-in file viewer.

Limitations

Interface can feel slightly dated compared to newer software.
Large number of options may overwhelm novice users initially.
File Roller

File Roller

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent integration with GNOME desktop.
Simple and intuitive user interface.
Supports a wide range of common archive formats.
Easy to use for basic compression and extraction.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features found in specialized archiving software.
Limited options for fine-tuning compression settings.
May not support all niche archive formats.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare