QEMU vs Parallels Desktop

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

QEMU

QEMU (Quick Emulator) is a versatile and powerful open-source hardware virtualizer and emulator. It allows you to run operating systems and programs designed for different architectures on your existing hardware. Acting as a hosted hypervisor, QEMU provides a virtual machine monitor for executing guest systems. by Fabrice Bellard

Open Source

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

VS

VS

Parallels Desktop icon

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac enables users to run Windows, Linux, and other operating systems side-by-side with macOS without rebooting. It provides seamless integration and performance for various applications. by Parallels IP Holdings GmbH

Commercial

Platforms: Mac OS X

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

QEMU and Parallels Desktop are both powerful solutions in their space. QEMU offers qemu (quick emulator) is a versatile and powerful open-source hardware virtualizer and emulator. it allows you to run operating systems and programs designed for different architectures on your existing hardware. acting as a hosted hypervisor, qemu provides a virtual machine monitor for executing guest systems., while Parallels Desktop provides parallels desktop for mac enables users to run windows, linux, and other operating systems side-by-side with macos without rebooting. it provides seamless integration and performance for various applications.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

QEMU

QEMU

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent cross-architecture emulation capabilities.

Highly flexible and configurable via command line.

Supports a wide range of guest operating systems and hardware.

Integrates well with hardware virtualization extensions (KVM, HAXM) for performance.

Open source with a large, active community and continuous development.

Supports multiple disk image formats, including VMDK.

Limitations

Command-line interface can be complex for beginners.

Emulation performance is significantly lower than hardware virtualization.

Requires understanding of various hardware and networking concepts for advanced configurations.

Documentation can be extensive but sometimes challenging to navigate.

Setting up shared folders and specific device passthrough can be less straightforward than in some GUI-based hypervisors.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent performance for running virtual machines.

Seamless integration with macOS, including file sharing and Coherence mode.

Easy to set up and use.

Regularly updated for compatibility with new OS versions.

Supports a wide range of guest operating systems.

Limitations

Higher price point compared to some alternative virtualization options.

Can consume significant system resources depending on the virtual machine configuration and workload.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) icon

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) vs QEMU

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

OpenStack vs QEMU

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Advertisement

Portable Virtualbox icon

Portable Virtualbox vs QEMU

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

VirtualBox icon

VirtualBox vs QEMU

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

VMware Workstation Player icon

VMware Workstation Player vs QEMU

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

VMware Workstation icon

VMware Workstation vs QEMU

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

clearVM vs QEMU

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare