qpdfview vs Universal Viewer

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

qpdfview icon

qpdfview

qpdfview is a lightweight, tabbed document viewer based on Qt. It supports PDF, DjVu, PostScript, and other document formats, offering features like annotation, form filling, and a clean, customizable interface for efficient document management.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Haiku Qt
Screenshots:
VS
Universal Viewer icon

Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications. by UVViewSoft

Freemium
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

qpdfview and Universal Viewer are both powerful solutions in their space. qpdfview offers qpdfview is a lightweight, tabbed document viewer based on qt. it supports pdf, djvu, postscript, and other document formats, offering features like annotation, form filling, and a clean, customizable interface for efficient document management., while Universal Viewer provides universal viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

qpdfview

qpdfview

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Very fast document loading and rendering.
Low memory and CPU usage.
Clean and intuitive user interface.
Supports tabbed viewing for multiple documents.
Includes basic PDF annotation and form filling.

Limitations

Limited advanced PDF editing capabilities.
Annotation features are basic.
Support for less common document formats may require external libraries.
Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a very wide range of file formats.
Completely portable, no installation required.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.
Useful binary and hexadecimal viewing modes.
Efficient searching across different file types.

Limitations

Does not offer editing capabilities.
Multimedia playback relies on system codecs.
Interface, while functional, is relatively basic.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare