qpdfview vs zathura

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

qpdfview icon

qpdfview

qpdfview is a lightweight, tabbed document viewer based on Qt. It supports PDF, DjVu, PostScript, and other document formats, offering features like annotation, form filling, and a clean, customizable interface for efficient document management.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Haiku Qt
Screenshots:
VS
zathura icon

zathura

Zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the Poppler rendering engine. It is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings. by pwmt.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

qpdfview and zathura are both powerful solutions in their space. qpdfview offers qpdfview is a lightweight, tabbed document viewer based on qt. it supports pdf, djvu, postscript, and other document formats, offering features like annotation, form filling, and a clean, customizable interface for efficient document management., while zathura provides zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the poppler rendering engine. it is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

qpdfview

qpdfview

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Very fast document loading and rendering.
Low memory and CPU usage.
Clean and intuitive user interface.
Supports tabbed viewing for multiple documents.
Includes basic PDF annotation and form filling.

Limitations

Limited advanced PDF editing capabilities.
Annotation features are basic.
Support for less common document formats may require external libraries.
zathura

zathura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Excellent keyboard navigation for efficient browsing.
Highly customizable through a simple configuration file.
Minimalistic and clean user interface.
Low memory usage makes it suitable for older systems.
Supports multiple document formats via backends.

Limitations

Steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with keyboard shortcuts.
Lacks advanced features found in mainstream viewers (e.g., comprehensive annotation, form filling).
Configuration requires editing a text file.
No graphical menus or toolbars for easy access to options.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare