Qt Creator vs wxWidgets : Which is Better?

Qt Creator icon

Qt Creator

Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment which is part of the SDK for the Qt GUI Application development framework. Developed by Qt Project

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

VS
VS
wxWidgets icon

wxWidgets

wxWidgets (wix-widgets, formerly wxWindows) is a widget toolkit and tools library for creating graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for cross-platform applications.

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux

Qt Creator VS wxWidgets

Qt Creator is a comprehensive IDE that provides an integrated environment for developing cross-platform applications with a rich feature set, including an integrated UI designer and extensive libraries. In contrast, wxWidgets is a lightweight C++ library that focuses on providing a native look and feel for applications, but lacks the full IDE capabilities and advanced features of Qt Creator.

Qt Creator

Pros:

  • Feature-rich IDE
  • Strong community support
  • Excellent documentation
  • Cross-platform development
  • Integrated UI designer
  • Built-in debugging tools
  • Supports modern C++
  • Active development and updates
  • Custom widget creation
  • Rich set of libraries

Cons:

  • Can be resource-intensive
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Licensing costs for commercial use
  • Complexity in large projects
  • Requires Qt libraries for deployment
  • Less control over UI in some cases
  • Not as lightweight as wxWidgets
  • Can be overkill for simple applications
  • Dependency on Qt framework
  • Limited support for non-C++ languages

wxWidgets

Pros:

  • Lightweight and minimalistic
  • C++ based with native look and feel
  • Flexible for GUI development
  • Good for simple applications
  • Less overhead compared to full IDEs
  • Cross-platform support
  • Open-source and free
  • Easy integration with existing code
  • Large collection of controls
  • Strong community support

Cons:

  • Lacks a full IDE environment
  • No built-in UI designer
  • Limited advanced features
  • Requires more manual coding
  • Less modern tooling
  • Documentation can be sparse
  • Fewer built-in debugging tools
  • Not as feature-rich as Qt
  • Limited community plugins
  • No integrated deployment tools

Compare Qt Creator

vs
Compare Android Studio and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Anjuta and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Apache Cordova and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Aptana Studio and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Atom and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare B4X and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare BBEdit and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bloodshed Dev-C++ and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CLion and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Coda and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Code::Blocks and Qt Creator and decide which is most suitable for you.