QupZilla vs Dillo

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

QupZilla icon

QupZilla

QupZilla is a free and open-source web browser designed for general users, emphasizing speed, privacy, and a clean user interface. It leverages the powerful QtWebEngine to deliver a modern browsing experience while remaining lightweight and resource-efficient.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD PortableApps.com Haiku
Screenshots:
VS
Dillo icon

Dillo

Dillo is an exceptionally lightweight and fast web browser designed for resource-constrained systems. It prioritizes speed and efficiency, making it ideal for older computers, embedded devices, or users seeking fundamental web browsing without modern complexities.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

QupZilla and Dillo are both powerful solutions in their space. QupZilla offers qupzilla is a free and open-source web browser designed for general users, emphasizing speed, privacy, and a clean user interface. it leverages the powerful qtwebengine to deliver a modern browsing experience while remaining lightweight and resource-efficient., while Dillo provides dillo is an exceptionally lightweight and fast web browser designed for resource-constrained systems. it prioritizes speed and efficiency, making it ideal for older computers, embedded devices, or users seeking fundamental web browsing without modern complexities.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

QupZilla

QupZilla

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Built-in ad and tracker blocking enhance privacy.
Lightweight and consumes fewer system resources.
Portable version available for flexible use.
Customizable user interface.

Limitations

Smaller extension ecosystem compared to major browsers.
Less frequent updates compared to some mainstream browsers.
May encounter compatibility issues with some complex web applications.
Dillo

Dillo

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast on limited hardware
Requires very few system resources
Built-in basic ad-blocking
Enhanced privacy by design
Portable and lightweight

Limitations

Limited support for modern web standards (CSS, JavaScript)
Many modern websites may not render correctly or function
Minimalistic user interface with limited features
Lack of extensibility via plugins/extensions
Not suitable for accessing complex web applications

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare