RAWGraphs vs Processing.js : Which is Better?

RAWGraphs icon

RAWGraphs

RAWGraphs allows you to export visualizations as vector (SVG) or raster (PNG) images and embed them into your web page. Developed by DensityDesign

License: Open Source

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Online

VS
VS
Processing.js icon

Processing.js

Processing.js is a JavaScript port of Processing, a programming language designed to write visualizations, images, and interactive content. Developed by John Reisig

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Online

RAWGraphs VS Processing.js

RAWGraphs is a user-friendly tool focused on easy data visualization without the need for programming, making it suitable for quick and effective visualizations. In contrast, Processing.js offers extensive customization and programming capabilities, ideal for artists and developers looking to create complex interactive graphics and animations.

RAWGraphs

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface for data visualization
  • No programming skills required
  • Supports a wide range of data formats
  • Quickly create visualizations from CSV files
  • Offers a variety of built-in chart types
  • Good documentation and tutorials available
  • Cross-browser compatibility
  • Allows for interactive visualizations
  • Supports exporting to vector formats (SVG)
  • Active community for support

Cons:

  • Limited customization options
  • Less suitable for complex interactive graphics
  • May be restrictive for advanced users
  • Not ideal for real-time data manipulation
  • Dependent on a stable internet connection for online usage
  • Can be slow with very large datasets
  • Limited animation capabilities
  • Less control over the visual output
  • Requires a learning curve for complex visualizations
  • Not suitable for detailed graphic design

Processing.js

Pros:

  • Highly customizable visualizations
  • Strong programming capabilities for complex graphics
  • Can create rich interactive applications
  • Supports a wide range of graphics and animations
  • Ideal for artists and designers
  • Extensive library for graphics programming
  • Cross-platform support
  • Allows for real-time data manipulation
  • Can integrate with other JavaScript libraries
  • Good performance for large datasets

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Requires programming knowledge
  • Can be overkill for simple visualizations
  • Not primarily focused on data visualization
  • More suited for artistic projects than business use
  • May require more development time
  • Integration can be complex
  • Performance can vary based on the complexity of the code
  • Debugging can be challenging
  • Less user-friendly for non-programmers

Compare RAWGraphs

vs
Compare AnyChart and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CanvasJS Charts and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ChartURL and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare D3.js and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Datacopia and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FusionCharts Suite XT and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Google Charts and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Highcharts and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare NVD3 and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PanXpan and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Plotly and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Raphaël and RAWGraphs and decide which is most suitable for you.