ReText VS TextPad Feature comparision
| Feature | ReText | TextPad |
|---|---|---|
| Live Preview | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| MarkDown support | ||
| End-to-End Encryption | ||
| Cloud sync | ||
| Encrypted Notes | ||
| WYSIWYG Support | ||
| Support for LaTeX | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Text formatting | ||
| Support for Windows Hello | ||
| Macros | ||
| Multi-project management | ||
| FLOSS | ||
| No Tracking | ||
| Privacy-friendly | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Dropbox integration | ||
| Google Drive integration | ||
| Works Offline | ||
| Tumblr integration | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Integrated FTP client | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes |
Compare ReText
Compare EditPad Lite and ReText and decide which is most suitable for you.
