RethinkDB vs Redis

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

RethinkDB icon

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is a free and open-source, distributed document database designed for building real-time web applications.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Discontinued
Screenshots:
VS
Redis icon

Redis

Redis is an open-source, in-memory data structure store used as a database, cache, and message broker. It supports various data structures like strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, and more, offering high performance and versatility for modern application development. by Salvatore Sanfilippo

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Self-Hosted
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

RethinkDB and Redis are both powerful solutions in their space. RethinkDB offers rethinkdb is a free and open-source, distributed document database designed for building real-time web applications., while Redis provides redis is an open-source, in-memory data structure store used as a database, cache, and message broker. it supports various data structures like strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, and more, offering high performance and versatility for modern application development.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent real-time data pushing capabilities (changefeeds).
Elegant and programmatic query language (ReQL).
Flexible JSON document model.
Designed for distributed deployments and scalability.
Active open-source community maintaining the project.

Limitations

Original commercial company is no longer operational.
Reliance on community for support and future development.
Smaller ecosystem compared to larger databases like MongoDB or PostgreSQL.
Steeper learning curve for ReQL compared to SQL for some developers.
Redis

Redis

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Exceptional speed and low latency due to in-memory storage.
Supports a wide range of versatile data structures.
Robust persistence options for data durability.
Scalable with built-in clustering support.
Can function as an efficient message broker.
Strong community support and extensive documentation.

Limitations

Can be memory-intensive for very large datasets.
Not designed for complex relational queries or joins.
Data must fit largely within available RAM for optimal performance.
Security requires careful configuration and network isolation.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare