Rosegarden vs LilyPond

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Rosegarden icon

Rosegarden

Rosegarden is a free digital audio workstation (DAW) for Linux users, tailored for music composition, editing, and recording, integrating MIDI and audio capabilities with a strong emphasis on scorewriting. by Chris Cannam, Richard Bown, Guillaume Laurent, et al.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:
VS
LilyPond icon

LilyPond

LilyPond is a powerful and flexible music engraving program designed to produce high-quality sheet music. It focuses on automated layout and beautiful typography, relying on a textual input language. by GNU Project

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Rosegarden and LilyPond are both powerful solutions in their space. Rosegarden offers rosegarden is a free digital audio workstation (daw) for linux users, tailored for music composition, editing, and recording, integrating midi and audio capabilities with a strong emphasis on scorewriting., while LilyPond provides lilypond is a powerful and flexible music engraving program designed to produce high-quality sheet music. it focuses on automated layout and beautiful typography, relying on a textual input language.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Rosegarden

Rosegarden

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Powerful and integrated score editor.
Combines MIDI sequencing and audio recording/editing.
Available for free and is open source.
Customizable interface for workflow optimization.
Stable and actively maintained.

Limitations

User interface can feel dated and less intuitive.
Audio editing features are relatively basic.
Steeper learning curve for users new to music notation software.
Plugin compatibility can sometimes require configuration.
LilyPond

LilyPond

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Produces exceptionally high-quality, professional-grade sheet music.
Automated engraving engine handles complex layout rules precisely.
Text-based input offers fine-grained control and is suitable for version control.
Supports a broad range of musical symbols and notation.
Cross-platform availability.

Limitations

Has a steeper learning curve compared to graphical score editors.
Requires learning a specific text-based input language.
Not designed for live entry or quick sketching of musical ideas.
Focuses on engraving, not audio playback or MIDI sequencing in the same way as a DAW.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare