Rsnapshot vs Back In Time

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Rsnapshot icon

Rsnapshot

Rsnapshot is a filesystem snapshot utility built on rsync, designed for creating incremental backups of local and remote filesystems. by Nathan Rosenquist

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:
VS
Back In Time icon

Back In Time

Back In Time is a robust and user-friendly backup software designed for Linux systems. It creates snapshots of specified directories, allowing users to easily restore individual files or entire directories to previous states. Modeled after Apple's Time Machine, it offers a familiar and intuitive interface for managing backups.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Rsnapshot and Back In Time are both powerful solutions in their space. Rsnapshot offers rsnapshot is a filesystem snapshot utility built on rsync, designed for creating incremental backups of local and remote filesystems., while Back In Time provides back in time is a robust and user-friendly backup software designed for linux systems. it creates snapshots of specified directories, allowing users to easily restore individual files or entire directories to previous states. modeled after apple's time machine, it offers a familiar and intuitive interface for managing backups.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Rsnapshot

Rsnapshot

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly storage efficient due to hard linking
Leverages the robust and proven rsync tool
Flexible and customizable through text configuration
Supports local and remote backups over SSH
Automated retention policy management
Simple file restoration process

Limitations

Command-line interface only (no native GUI)
Requires understanding of rsync and configuration files
Initial full backup can be time-consuming for large datasets
Back In Time

Back In Time

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Easy to use graphical interface.
Efficient incremental backups using hard links.
Flexible scheduling options.
Simple and quick restoration process.
Supports various backup destinations.

Limitations

Primarily a file-level backup tool, not for bare-metal recovery.
Configuration can be slightly complex for advanced exclusion rules.
Relies on the file system for efficiency (best on journaling file systems).

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare