rsync vs SyncBack

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

rsync icon

rsync

rsync is a versatile command-line utility designed for efficient file transfer and synchronization. It specializes in incremental transfers, copying only the parts of files that have changed since the last synchronization, making it highly efficient for backups and mirroring. by Wayne Davison

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD Haiku
VS
SyncBack icon

SyncBack

SyncBack is a robust backup and synchronization software designed for Windows. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools to protect your important data by automating backups, restoring files, and synchronizing directories across various storage mediums, including local drives, network locations, cloud storage, and FTP/SFTP servers. by 2 Bright Sparks

Freemium
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

rsync and SyncBack are both powerful solutions in their space. rsync offers rsync is a versatile command-line utility designed for efficient file transfer and synchronization. it specializes in incremental transfers, copying only the parts of files that have changed since the last synchronization, making it highly efficient for backups and mirroring., while SyncBack provides syncback is a robust backup and synchronization software designed for windows. it offers a comprehensive suite of tools to protect your important data by automating backups, restoring files, and synchronizing directories across various storage mediums, including local drives, network locations, cloud storage, and ftp/sftp servers.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

rsync

rsync

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly efficient incremental transfers using the delta-transfer algorithm.
Preserves a wide range of file attributes (permissions, timestamps, etc.).
Extensive command-line options for fine-grained control.
Excellent for scripting and automation of synchronization tasks.
Supports various transfer methods, including secure SSH.
Widely available on different operating systems.

Limitations

Command-line interface can be intimidating for novice users.
Requires a good understanding of options for complex scenarios.
Lacks a built-in graphical user interface.
Complex ACLs or extended attributes might not be fully preserved in all cases.
SyncBack

SyncBack

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extensive support for various storage types including Cloud and FTP/SFTP.
Highly customizable backup and synchronization profiles.
Robust automation and scheduling options.
Comprehensive logging and reporting features.
Supports different backup types (full, incremental, differential).

Limitations

User interface can appear complex due to the large number of features.
Steeper learning curve for users new to backup and sync concepts.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare