Ruby on Rails vs web2py

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Ruby on Rails icon

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails is a powerful, open-source server-side web application framework written in Ruby. It provides a robust structure for building database-backed web applications quickly and efficiently, emphasizing convention over configuration. by David Heinemeier Hansson

Open Source

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Ruby

Alternatives Details Website

VS

VS

web2py

web2py is a free and open-source web framework for agile development of secure, portable, and scalable database-driven web applications, written in Python. by Massimo Di Pierro

Open Source

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Self-Hosted Python

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

Ruby on Rails and web2py are both powerful solutions in their space. Ruby on Rails offers ruby on rails is a powerful, open-source server-side web application framework written in ruby. it provides a robust structure for building database-backed web applications quickly and efficiently, emphasizing convention over configuration., while web2py provides web2py is a free and open-source web framework for agile development of secure, portable, and scalable database-driven web applications, written in python.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Rapid application development

Convention over configuration model

Strong and active community

Excellent Object-Relational Mapping (Active Record)

Large ecosystem of libraries (gems)

Integrated security features

Limitations

Learning curve for understanding conventions

Performance could be a factor for extremely CPU-bound applications

Dependencies on the Ruby ecosystem

web2py

web2py

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Easy to learn and get started with minimal configuration.

Strong emphasis on security with built-in protection against common vulnerabilities.

Includes essential components like a web server and database abstraction out-of-the-box.

Facilitates rapid application development.

Good documentation and online resources available.

Limitations

Community size and third-party ecosystem are smaller than some other Python frameworks.

The integrated web server is not suitable for high-traffic production environments.

The templating language might be less familiar to developers used to other syntaxes.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Agile Toolkit icon

Ruby on Rails icon

Agile Toolkit vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Ruby on Rails icon

ASP.NET vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Ruby on Rails icon

CakePHP vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

CodeIgniter icon

Ruby on Rails icon

CodeIgniter vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Advertisement

Ruby on Rails icon

Django vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Ruby on Rails icon

Meteor vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Ruby on Rails icon

Play! vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Ruby on Rails icon

Portofino vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Ruby on Rails icon

Symfony vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

CUBA.platform icon

Ruby on Rails icon

CUBA.platform vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Ruby on Rails icon

Wakanda vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Yii Framework icon

Ruby on Rails icon

Yii Framework vs Ruby on Rails

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare