Ruby vs Erlang : Which is Better?

Ruby icon

Ruby

Ruby is a dynamic, reflective, object-oriented, general-purpose programming language. Developed by Yukihiro Matsumoto, et al.

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Haiku

VS
VS
Erlang icon

Erlang

Erlang is a programming language used to build massively scalable soft real-time systems with requirements on high availability. Developed by Ericsson

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

Ruby VS Erlang

Erlang excels in concurrency, fault tolerance, and real-time processing, making it ideal for distributed systems and telecommunications. Ruby, on the other hand, is known for its elegant syntax and ease of use, making it a popular choice for web development and rapid prototyping.

Ruby

Pros:

  • Easy to learn and use
  • Rich set of libraries and frameworks
  • Strong community support
  • Great for web development with Ruby on Rails
  • Object-oriented programming features
  • Readable and elegant syntax
  • Rapid application development
  • Excellent for prototyping
  • Large ecosystem of tools and gems
  • Cross-platform support

Cons:

  • Performance can be a concern
  • Concurrency is less efficient than Erlang
  • Not as suitable for low-level system programming
  • Less fault tolerance compared to Erlang
  • Requires more resources for large applications
  • Can become complex for large codebases
  • Slower execution speed for certain tasks
  • Garbage collection can introduce latency
  • Not as good for real-time applications
  • Decentralized architecture can be challenging

Erlang

Pros:

  • Highly concurrent
  • Excellent fault tolerance
  • Supports functional programming
  • Hot code swapping feature
  • Ideal for telecom and distributed systems
  • Strongly suited for real-time applications
  • Low-level control over processes
  • Lightweight processes for managing tasks
  • Robust error handling mechanisms
  • Designed for distributed systems

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve
  • Less popular for general-purpose programming
  • Limited libraries compared to Ruby
  • Not as suitable for web development
  • Verbose syntax compared to Ruby
  • Requires understanding of concurrency models
  • Less community support compared to mainstream languages
  • Limited resources for learning
  • Not widely used outside specific domains
  • Difficult to debug in some cases

Compare Ruby

vs
Compare ASP.NET and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare C# and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Clojure and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare C++ and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare D (Programming Language) and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Dart and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare F# (programming language) and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FreeBASIC and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Go (Programming Language) and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Groovy and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Hack and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Haskell and Ruby and decide which is most suitable for you.