SciTE VS HippoEDIT Feature comparision
| Feature | SciTE | HippoEDIT |
|---|---|---|
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Live Preview | ||
| Integrated FTP client | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes |
Compare SciTE
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and SciTE and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and SciTE and decide which is most suitable for you.
