Serviio vs MediaTomb

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Serviio icon

Serviio

Serviio is a robust freeware media server application empowering users to seamlessly stream their digital media collection across their home network. It supports a wide range of devices including DLNA-compliant TVs, game consoles like PlayStation and Xbox, and mobile devices, making accessing your music, movies, and photos easy and convenient.

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
VS
MediaTomb icon

MediaTomb

MediaTomb is a free, open-source UPnP MediaServer designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart TVs, game consoles, and other UPnP/DLNA clients.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux

Comparison Summary

Serviio and MediaTomb are both powerful solutions in their space. Serviio offers serviio is a robust freeware media server application empowering users to seamlessly stream their digital media collection across their home network. it supports a wide range of devices including dlna-compliant tvs, game consoles like playstation and xbox, and mobile devices, making accessing your music, movies, and photos easy and convenient., while MediaTomb provides mediatomb is a free, open-source upnp mediaserver designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart tvs, game consoles, and other upnp/dlna clients.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Serviio

Serviio

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Wide compatibility with DLNA devices
Excellent media format support and on-the-fly transcoding
Effective automatic metadata retrieval
Easy to set up and manage
Completely free to use

Limitations

Client interface experience is dependent on the receiving device
MediaTomb

MediaTomb

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly configurable and flexible.
Open-source and free to use.
Supports dynamic media transcoding.
Lightweight and efficient with system resources.
Compatible with a wide range of DLNA/UPnP devices.

Limitations

Configuration can be complex for beginners.
User interface is functional but dated.
Active development has slowed down.
Requires a degree of technical knowledge for optimal setup.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare