SimpleScreenRecorder vs Kazam : Which is Better?

SimpleScreenRecorder icon

SimpleScreenRecorder

SimpleScreenRecorder is a Qt-based screencast software made for Linux operating systems, which was created as a simpler alternative to programs such as ffmpeg/avconv and VLC.

License: Open Source

Categories: Video & Movies

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
Kazam icon

Kazam

Kazam is a simple screen recording program that will capture the content of your screen and record a video file that can be played by any video player. Developed by Andrew

License: Open Source

Categories: Video & Movies

Apps available for Linux

SimpleScreenRecorder VS Kazam

SimpleScreenRecorder offers a wider range of features, including multiple output formats and customizable frame rates, making it suitable for advanced users. Kazam is more user-friendly and simpler to set up, making it ideal for casual users who need basic screen recording capabilities.

SimpleScreenRecorder

Pros:

  • High customization options for recording settings
  • Supports multiple video formats
  • Less performance impact during recording
  • Ability to record specific screen regions
  • Offers hardware acceleration for better performance
  • Pause and resume feature is very useful
  • User-friendly interface with intuitive controls
  • Good audio recording capabilities
  • Supports webcam recording effectively
  • Flexible video quality settings

Cons:

  • No built-in editing features
  • Can be overwhelming for absolute beginners
  • Setup might be complex for some advanced features
  • Limited support for live streaming
  • Requires manual installation of dependencies

Kazam

Pros:

  • Simple and clean interface
  • Easy to use for beginners
  • Quick setup for screen recording
  • Good integration with the desktop environment
  • Allows recording of audio from desktop and microphone
  • Lightweight application with minimal resource usage
  • Region selection is straightforward
  • Provides basic video recording features
  • Sufficient for casual users
  • No complex setup required

Cons:

  • Limited output format options
  • Lacks advanced features for professional use
  • No customizable frame rates
  • Does not support hardware acceleration
  • Performance may degrade with high-resolution recordings

Compare SimpleScreenRecorder

vs
Compare Action! and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ActivePresenter and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bandicam and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FlashBack and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CamStudio and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Camtasia Studio and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Captura and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Debut Video Capture Software and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare recordMyDesktop and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare iSpring Free Cam and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Krut and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare oCam and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.