skipfish vs Nikto : Which is Better?
skipfish
Skipfish is an active web application security reconnaissance tool. Developed by google
License: Open Source
Nikto
Nikto is an Open Source (GPL) web server scanner which performs comprehensive tests against web servers for multiple items, including over 6700 potentially dangerous files/programs, checks for outdated versions of over 1250 servers, and version specific problems on over 270 servers. Developed by Chris Sullo and David Lodge
License: Open Source
skipfish VS Nikto
Skipfish is primarily designed for fast and efficient active web application scanning with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for quick assessments. In contrast, Nikto offers comprehensive scanning capabilities, especially for web servers, with a focus on identifying a wide range of vulnerabilities, but may require more time and complexity to set up.
skipfish
Pros:
- Fast and efficient scanning
- Generates detailed reports
- Active scanning capabilities
- Highly customizable
- User-friendly interface
- Good community support
- Cross-platform compatibility
- Supports various protocols
- Low false positive rate
- Ability to test session management
Cons:
- Limited passive scanning features
- Requires more resources for large applications
- Less effective against complex web applications
- Less community-driven updates
- Not focused on API security
Nikto
Pros:
- Comprehensive scanning of web servers
- Detects a wide range of vulnerabilities
- Excellent for API testing
- Strong database security testing capabilities
- Good authentication testing features
- Robust SSL/TLS testing
- Open source with active development
- Detailed reporting options
- Low resource usage
- Can be integrated with other security tools
Cons:
- Slower scanning compared to Skipfish
- More complex to set up and configure
- Can generate false positives
- User interface less intuitive
- Less focus on application layer vulnerabilities
Compare skipfish
