SmoothVideo Project vs UMPlayer

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

SmoothVideo Project icon

SmoothVideo Project

SmoothVideo Project (SVP) is a software utility that enhances video playback by increasing the frame rate of any video to 60 frames per second or higher. It achieves this in real-time using advanced frame interpolation algorithms, making video motion appear smoother and more fluid directly within your preferred media player.

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:
VS
UMPlayer icon

UMPlayer

UMPlayer is a free and open-source cross-platform media player that boasts a built-in search for YouTube and Shoutcast radio, offering a wide range of supported formats and features like automatic subtitle downloads and customizable playback options. by Ori Rejwan

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

SmoothVideo Project and UMPlayer are both powerful solutions in their space. SmoothVideo Project offers smoothvideo project (svp) is a software utility that enhances video playback by increasing the frame rate of any video to 60 frames per second or higher. it achieves this in real-time using advanced frame interpolation algorithms, making video motion appear smoother and more fluid directly within your preferred media player., while UMPlayer provides umplayer is a free and open-source cross-platform media player that boasts a built-in search for youtube and shoutcast radio, offering a wide range of supported formats and features like automatic subtitle downloads and customizable playback options.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

SmoothVideo Project

SmoothVideo Project

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Significantly improves video motion smoothness in real-time.
Works with a wide range of existing video players.
Highly customizable interpolation settings.
Utilizes GPU acceleration for improved performance.
Can breathe new life into older video content.

Limitations

Can be computationally intensive, requiring capable hardware.
Potential for visual artifacts like the 'soap opera effect'.
Configuration can be complex for novice users.
Requires integration with a separate media player.
UMPlayer

UMPlayer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Plays almost all audio and video formats without extra codecs.
Integrated search and streaming for YouTube and Shoutcast.
Automatic subtitle searching and downloading feature.
Lightweight and portable options available.
Customizable interface with skinnable themes.
Resumes playback from the last position.

Limitations

User interface can appear somewhat dated compared to modern players.
Media library features are basic compared to dedicated managers.
Development activity might not be as frequent as some other open-source projects.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare