SoftEther VPN vs LogMeIn Hamachi : Which is Better?

SoftEther VPN icon

SoftEther VPN

SoftEther VPN is free open-source, cross-platform, multi-protocol VPN client and VPN server software. Developed by University of Tsukuba

License: Open Source

Categories: Security & Privacy

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

VS
VS
LogMeIn Hamachi icon

LogMeIn Hamachi

LogMeIn Hamachi is a hosted VPN service that securely connects devices and networks, extending LAN-like network connectivity to mobile. Developed by LogMeIn

License: Commercial

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux

SoftEther VPN VS LogMeIn Hamachi

SoftEther VPN is a highly configurable and open-source solution that excels in performance and flexibility, making it suitable for advanced users and diverse networking scenarios. In contrast, LogMeIn Hamachi is designed for ease of use and is ideal for small teams needing quick remote access and file sharing, but it comes with limitations in bandwidth and advanced features.

SoftEther VPN

Pros:

  • Open-source software
  • Highly configurable
  • Supports multiple VPN protocols
  • Strong security features
  • No bandwidth limitations
  • Can operate as a VPN server and client
  • Ideal for various networking setups
  • Robust performance with low latency
  • Supports mesh networking
  • Rich documentation and community support

Cons:

  • Complex for beginners
  • Limited user management features
  • Can require advanced technical knowledge
  • Not as widely supported as some commercial VPNs
  • May need additional configuration for optimal performance
  • Lacks a dedicated support team
  • No built-in client in some versions
  • Not designed for casual users
  • Potentially more resource-intensive
  • May require server setup

LogMeIn Hamachi

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface
  • Simple setup process
  • Effective for small teams
  • Good for remote access and file sharing
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Offers a free version for limited use
  • Good performance for basic networking needs
  • No need for advanced configuration
  • Reliable connection stability
  • Integrated with other applications

Cons:

  • Limited features in the free version
  • Monthly subscription required for full features
  • Bandwidth limitations can hinder performance
  • Not ideal for large networks
  • Less flexibility compared to traditional VPNs
  • No advanced security configurations available
  • Dependency on centralized servers
  • Limited troubleshooting resources
  • May not be suitable for enterprise use
  • Not open-source, potential privacy concerns

Compare SoftEther VPN

vs
Compare Lantern and SoftEther VPN and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare OpenVPN and SoftEther VPN and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Tor and SoftEther VPN and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Tor Browser and SoftEther VPN and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ZeroTier One and SoftEther VPN and decide which is most suitable for you.