SOGo vs Baïkal

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

SOGo icon

SOGo

SOGo is a powerful open-source groupware server designed for scalability and simplicity. It provides a comprehensive suite of collaborative features including webmail, calendaring, contact management, and task management, with strong support for standard protocols like CalDAV and CardDAV. by inverse

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Online Thunderbird Cloudron
VS
Baïkal icon

Baïkal

Baïkal is a lightweight and easy-to-use CalDAV and CardDAV server, providing a simple way to sync your calendars and contacts across various devices and applications. Built upon the robust sabre/dav library, it offers a straightforward administrative interface for seamless management of users and data. by Jérôme Schneider

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone Android Tablet BSD Windows Phone iPad MySQL Community Edition Self-Hosted NGINX Apache HTTP Server PHP SQLite
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

SOGo and Baïkal are both powerful solutions in their space. SOGo offers sogo is a powerful open-source groupware server designed for scalability and simplicity. it provides a comprehensive suite of collaborative features including webmail, calendaring, contact management, and task management, with strong support for standard protocols like caldav and carddav., while Baïkal provides baïkal is a lightweight and easy-to-use caldav and carddav server, providing a simple way to sync your calendars and contacts across various devices and applications. built upon the robust sabre/dav library, it offers a straightforward administrative interface for seamless management of users and data.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

SOGo

SOGo

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Open-source with no per-user licensing costs.
Strong support for CalDAV, CardDAV, and IMAP for broad client compatibility.
Comprehensive webmail, calendar, and contact management features.
Scalable architecture.
Self-hostable, offering control over data.

Limitations

Requires technical expertise for installation and maintenance.
Task management is functional but not as feature-rich as dedicated solutions.
Lacks advanced real-time collaboration features like document co-editing or integrated chat.
Dependency on external infrastructure components like databases and MTAs.
Baïkal

Baïkal

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Easy to install and configure.
Lightweight with minimal resource requirements.
Provides full control over personal data.
Supports a wide range of CalDAV and CardDAV clients.
Simple and intuitive administrative interface.

Limitations

Limited feature set compared to full groupware suites.
Requires some technical knowledge to set up and maintain a server environment.
Relies on external clients for user interaction beyond administration.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare