Splash vs UMPlayer

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Splash icon

Splash

Splash is a powerful and modern media player designed for high-quality video playback, supporting a wide range of formats and leveraging hardware acceleration for smooth performance. It also includes a built-in video converter. by Mirillis Ltd.

Freemium
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
UMPlayer icon

UMPlayer

UMPlayer is a free and open-source cross-platform media player that boasts a built-in search for YouTube and Shoutcast radio, offering a wide range of supported formats and features like automatic subtitle downloads and customizable playback options. by Ori Rejwan

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Splash and UMPlayer are both powerful solutions in their space. Splash offers splash is a powerful and modern media player designed for high-quality video playback, supporting a wide range of formats and leveraging hardware acceleration for smooth performance. it also includes a built-in video converter., while UMPlayer provides umplayer is a free and open-source cross-platform media player that boasts a built-in search for youtube and shoutcast radio, offering a wide range of supported formats and features like automatic subtitle downloads and customizable playback options.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Splash

Splash

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent video quality with advanced processing.
Strong hardware acceleration support for smooth playback.
Lightweight and efficient performance.
Clean and minimalistic user interface.
Includes a convenient built-in video converter.

Limitations

Advanced features may require a paid version.
Music playback functionality is basic.
Customization options could be more extensive.
UMPlayer

UMPlayer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Plays almost all audio and video formats without extra codecs.
Integrated search and streaming for YouTube and Shoutcast.
Automatic subtitle searching and downloading feature.
Lightweight and portable options available.
Customizable interface with skinnable themes.
Resumes playback from the last position.

Limitations

User interface can appear somewhat dated compared to modern players.
Media library features are basic compared to dedicated managers.
Development activity might not be as frequent as some other open-source projects.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare