sshfs vs Cyberduck

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

sshfs icon

sshfs

SSHFS (SSH Filesystem) allows you to mount a remote directory on your local machine as if it were a local filesystem. It uses the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol, providing a secure and convenient way to access and interact with files on a remote server directly from your local file manager or command line. by Filesystem in Userspace

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:
VS
Cyberduck icon

Cyberduck

Cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and major cloud storage services. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud. by iterate GmbH

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

sshfs and Cyberduck are both powerful solutions in their space. sshfs offers sshfs (ssh filesystem) allows you to mount a remote directory on your local machine as if it were a local filesystem. it uses the secure shell (ssh) protocol, providing a secure and convenient way to access and interact with files on a remote server directly from your local file manager or command line., while Cyberduck provides cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting ftp, sftp, webdav, and major cloud storage services. it provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

sshfs

sshfs

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Provides seamless integration of remote files into the local filesystem.
Leverages the secure and widely available SSH protocol.
Easy to set up and use with basic command-line knowledge.
Eliminates the need for a separate file transfer application for many tasks.
Works with standard file managers and applications.

Limitations

Performance is highly dependent on network speed and latency.
Can be less reliable than native filesystems over unstable networks.
Potential for performance issues with very large directories or files.
Error reporting can sometimes be limited.
Cyberduck

Cyberduck

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide range of protocols (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Azure, etc.)
Clean and user-friendly interface
Integrates with major cloud storage providers
Ability to mount remote storage as local drive (via associated tool)
File sharing and preview features
Open source and actively developed

Limitations

Synchronization features are basic compared to dedicated sync tools
Performance can vary based on connection/service speed
Some advanced features require paid extensions

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare