StarDict VS Reference.com Feature comparision
| Feature | StarDict | Reference.com |
|---|---|---|
| Works Offline | ||
| Multiple languages | ||
| Ad-free | ||
| IFTTT integration | ||
| User generated | ||
| Support of multiple dicitonary formats | ||
| Portable | ||
| Standalone | ||
| Reverse translation | ||
| Built-in translation | ||
| Definitions | ||
| Artificial intelligence | ||
| Grammar check | ||
| Proofreading | ||
| Online translation | ||
| CrowdSourced | ||
| Education | ||
| Wiki | ||
| Forums | ||
| French | ||
| German | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions |
Compare StarDict
Compare Aard Dictionary and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Dictionary.com and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GoldenDict and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Google Translate and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Merriam-Webster and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Tagaini jisho and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Wiktionary and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare WordReference and StarDict and decide which is most suitable for you.