Windows Task Manager vs GNOME System Monitor : Which is Better?

Windows Task Manager icon

Windows Task Manager

Task Manager, previously known as Windows Task Manager, is a task manager, system monitor, and startup manager included with Microsoft Windows systems. It provides limited information about computer performance and running applications, processes and CPU usage, commit charge and memory information, network activity and statistics, logged-in users, and system services. Developed by Microsoft

License: Free

Apps available for Windows

VS
VS
GNOME System Monitor icon

GNOME System Monitor

GNOME System Monitor shows you what programs are running and how much processor time, memory, and disk space are being used. Developed by The GNOME Project

License: Open Source

Apps available for Linux BSD

Windows Task Manager VS GNOME System Monitor

GNOME System Monitor is designed for Linux users and excels in resource management, offering detailed statistics and a customizable interface, making it ideal for advanced users. In contrast, Windows Task Manager provides a more user-friendly experience with task scheduling and application-specific monitoring, making it suitable for general users and those looking for straightforward performance management.

Windows Task Manager

Pros:

  • Task scheduling and automation
  • Simple and intuitive user interface
  • Broad compatibility with Windows applications
  • Process prioritization and management
  • Service management capabilities
  • Detailed performance metrics
  • Application-specific monitoring
  • Real-time network activity monitoring
  • Easy access to performance graphs
  • Integrated resource monitor for quick access

Cons:

  • Less detailed statistics compared to GNOME
  • Limited to Windows environments
  • Less customizable than GNOME
  • No integrated terminal
  • Can be overwhelming for novice users due to many features

GNOME System Monitor

Pros:

  • Detailed resource usage statistics
  • Good integration with GNOME desktop
  • Supports monitoring of multiple resources
  • Visual representation of system activity
  • Lightweight and efficient
  • Open-source and customizable
  • User session management
  • Disk usage analysis
  • Network monitoring capabilities
  • Integrated terminal for command execution

Cons:

  • Limited to Linux environments
  • Less focus on task scheduling
  • May not be as user-friendly for beginners
  • Lacks some advanced process management features
  • Dependent on GNOME interface for full functionality

Compare Windows Task Manager

vs
Compare AnVir Task Manager and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Atmonitor and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare glances and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare htop and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Process Explorer and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Process Hacker and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Process Monitor and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Resource Monitor and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare SpyStudio and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare SystemExplorer and Windows Task Manager and decide which is most suitable for you.