Tox vs IM+

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Tox icon

Tox

Tox is a free, open-source, and secure peer-to-peer instant messaging and video calling protocol designed for strong privacy and censorship resistance. It provides end-to-end encrypted communications without reliance on central servers. by Project Tox

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Android iPhone Android Tablet BSD
Screenshots:
VS
IM+ icon

IM+

IM+ is a versatile instant messaging application designed to unify communication across multiple platforms. It supports a wide array of popular services, including Google Talk, Twitter DMs, Yahoo!, AIM/iChat, ICQ, Jabber, and even Slack. IM+ simplifies staying connected with friends, family, and colleagues, offering a centralized hub for all your chat needs. by SHAPE Services

Freemium
Platforms: Online Windows Mobile Android iPhone Java Mobile Symbian S60 HP webOS Blackberry Android Tablet Windows Phone iPad Kindle Fire
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Tox and IM+ are both powerful solutions in their space. Tox offers tox is a free, open-source, and secure peer-to-peer instant messaging and video calling protocol designed for strong privacy and censorship resistance. it provides end-to-end encrypted communications without reliance on central servers., while IM+ provides im+ is a versatile instant messaging application designed to unify communication across multiple platforms. it supports a wide array of popular services, including google talk, twitter dms, yahoo!, aim/ichat, icq, jabber, and even slack. im+ simplifies staying connected with friends, family, and colleagues, offering a centralized hub for all your chat needs.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Tox

Tox

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Decentralized architecture enhances privacy and censorship resistance.
End-to-end encryption for all communication types by default.
No central servers mean no central point of failure or data collection.
Open-source protocol allows for independent verification of security.
Ad-free communication experience.

Limitations

User experience can be inconsistent depending on the client used.
Discovering and adding contacts can be less convenient than centralized platforms.
Both users must be online simultaneously for direct communication.
Group chat functionality and stability can vary significantly between clients.
Lack of features like message history sync across multiple devices by default due to decentralization.
IM+

IM+

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide range of instant messaging protocols.
Consolidates multiple chat accounts into one interface.
Unified contact list for easier management.
Simplifies managing conversations across different networks.
Includes support for Twitter DMs and Slack (via Jabber).

Limitations

Advanced features specific to native clients might not be fully supported.
Reliability can sometimes depend on external service changes.
Interface is functional but lacks modern visual flair.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare