Transmit vs Cyberduck

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Transmit icon

Transmit

Transmit is a highly-regarded file transfer client developed by Panic for macOS. It supports a wide range of protocols including FTP, SFTP, Amazon S3, and WebDAV, offering a robust and user-friendly interface for managing files on remote servers. by Panic Inc.

Commercial
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
Cyberduck icon

Cyberduck

Cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and major cloud storage services. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud. by iterate GmbH

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Transmit and Cyberduck are both powerful solutions in their space. Transmit offers transmit is a highly-regarded file transfer client developed by panic for macos. it supports a wide range of protocols including ftp, sftp, amazon s3, and webdav, offering a robust and user-friendly interface for managing files on remote servers., while Cyberduck provides cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting ftp, sftp, webdav, and major cloud storage services. it provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Transmit

Transmit

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent user interface and macOS integration.
Powerful 'Mount as Disk' feature for seamless interaction.
Wide range of protocol support, including SFTP and cloud storage.
Reliable and fast file transfers.
Panic Sync for easy preference synchronization across devices.

Limitations

Higher cost compared to some freeware alternatives.
Filters and rules can be complex for beginners.
Cyberduck

Cyberduck

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide range of protocols (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Azure, etc.)
Clean and user-friendly interface
Integrates with major cloud storage providers
Ability to mount remote storage as local drive (via associated tool)
File sharing and preview features
Open source and actively developed

Limitations

Synchronization features are basic compared to dedicated sync tools
Performance can vary based on connection/service speed
Some advanced features require paid extensions

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare