Transmit vs gFTP Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Transmit icon

Transmit

Transmit is a highly-regarded file transfer client developed by Panic for macOS. It supports a wide range of protocols including FTP, SFTP, Amazon S3, and WebDAV, offering a robust and user-friendly interface for managing files on remote servers. by Panic Inc.

Commercial
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X
VS
gFTP icon

gFTP

gFTP is a discontinued, free, open-source, multithreaded File Transfer Protocol client with a focus on simplicity and performance, offering support for various file transfer protocols like FTP and SFTP, primarily for Linux and Unix-like systems.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Linux Xfce Discontinued

Summary

Transmit and gFTP are both powerful solutions in their space. Transmit offers transmit is a highly-regarded file transfer client developed by panic for macos. it supports a wide range of protocols including ftp, sftp, amazon s3, and webdav, offering a robust and user-friendly interface for managing files on remote servers., while gFTP provides gftp is a discontinued, free, open-source, multithreaded file transfer protocol client with a focus on simplicity and performance, offering support for various file transfer protocols like ftp and sftp, primarily for linux and unix-like systems.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Transmit

Transmit

Pros

  • Excellent user interface and macOS integration.
  • Powerful 'Mount as Disk' feature for seamless interaction.
  • Wide range of protocol support, including SFTP and cloud storage.
  • Reliable and fast file transfers.
  • Panic Sync for easy preference synchronization across devices.

Cons

  • Higher cost compared to some freeware alternatives.
  • Filters and rules can be complex for beginners.
gFTP

gFTP

Pros

  • Supports multiple protocols including FTP, FTPS, and SFTP
  • Multithreaded for faster transfers
  • Supports FXP file transfers
  • Simple and intuitive two-pane interface
  • Open-source and free to use

Cons

  • Officially discontinued, no longer actively maintained
  • Lacks advanced features found in modern clients
  • Interface is dated compared to contemporary software
  • Potential compatibility issues with newer systems/servers

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare