Ubuntu Server vs Ubuntu GNOME : Which is Better?

Ubuntu Server icon

Ubuntu Server

Ubuntu Server brings economic and technical scalability to your datacentre, public or private. Whether you want to deploy an OpenStack cloud, a Hadoop cluster or a 50,000-node render farm, Ubuntu Server delivers the best value scale-out performance available. Developed by Canonical Ltd

License: Open Source

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
Ubuntu GNOME icon

Ubuntu GNOME

Ubuntu GNOME (Ubuntu GNOME Remix) is a Linux distribution, distributed as free and open-source software. Developed by Canonical Ltd

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux

Ubuntu Server VS Ubuntu GNOME

Ubuntu Server is designed for server environments, offering a command-line interface and optimized performance for backend tasks, while Ubuntu GNOME provides a full-featured desktop experience with a graphical interface suitable for everyday users. The choice between the two largely depends on whether the user needs a server-focused or desktop-oriented operating system.

Ubuntu Server

Pros:

  • Lightweight and efficient
  • Optimized for server tasks
  • Robust security features
  • Better performance on low-resource systems
  • Supports headless operation
  • Comprehensive command-line tools
  • Excellent for remote management
  • Highly customizable for server needs
  • Strong support for cloud applications
  • Good for running containers

Cons:

  • Lacks a graphical user interface
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Limited multimedia support
  • Not suitable for desktop use
  • Requires more technical knowledge
  • Configuration may be complex for new users
  • Less intuitive for those used to GUIs
  • Not ideal for general-purpose use
  • May require additional tools for management
  • Less focus on aesthetics

Ubuntu GNOME

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface
  • Rich GUI for applications
  • Ideal for desktop users
  • Extensive software availability
  • Supports multimedia applications
  • Easy installation of desktop environments
  • Great for development and testing
  • Strong community support for desktop users
  • Customizable desktop experience
  • Accessible to non-technical users

Cons:

  • Heavier resource usage
  • Not optimized for server tasks
  • May have slower performance on low-end hardware
  • Less secure by default compared to server version
  • Not suitable for headless operation
  • More vulnerable to desktop-targeted attacks
  • Less customizable for server needs
  • Can be overwhelming for new users due to options
  • May require more frequent updates
  • Not ideal for cloud or container setups

Compare Ubuntu Server

vs
Compare Alpine Linux and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ArchBang and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bodhi Linux and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Chromium OS and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CoreOS and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Debian and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Edubuntu and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare elementary OS and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Fedora and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FreeBSD and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Gentoo and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Haiku and Ubuntu Server and decide which is most suitable for you.