Ubuntu Server vs Windows Server 2012

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Ubuntu Server icon

Ubuntu Server

Ubuntu Server is a robust and scalable open-source operating system specifically designed for server environments. It provides a stable and secure foundation for a wide range of applications, from cloud deployments and data centers to enterprise infrastructure and development platforms. by Canonical Ltd

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:
VS
Windows Server 2012 icon

Windows Server 2012

Windows Server 2012 is a powerful and versatile server operating system designed for modern businesses and data centers. It offers a wide range of features for infrastructure management, virtualization, networking, storage, and application development, providing a robust platform for on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments. by Microsoft

Commercial
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Ubuntu Server and Windows Server 2012 are both powerful solutions in their space. Ubuntu Server offers ubuntu server is a robust and scalable open-source operating system specifically designed for server environments. it provides a stable and secure foundation for a wide range of applications, from cloud deployments and data centers to enterprise infrastructure and development platforms., while Windows Server 2012 provides windows server 2012 is a powerful and versatile server operating system designed for modern businesses and data centers. it offers a wide range of features for infrastructure management, virtualization, networking, storage, and application development, providing a robust platform for on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Ubuntu Server

Ubuntu Server

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent stability and reliability for server workloads.
Vast software availability via the APT package manager.
Strong focus on security and timely updates.
Optimized for cloud and scale-out deployments.
Large and active community with extensive documentation.
Free and open-source with commercial support options available.

Limitations

Requires command-line proficiency for advanced administration.
Minor compatibility issues can occasionally occur with very specific or bleeding-edge hardware.
The large number of packages can sometimes lead to dependency complexities if not managed carefully.
Windows Server 2012

Windows Server 2012

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Improved Hyper-V virtualization capabilities for enhanced performance and scalability.
Introduction of Storage Spaces for flexible and resilient storage solutions.
Built-in Data Deduplication feature for optimizing storage usage.
Enhanced Server Manager for streamlined multi-server management.
Significant advancements in PowerShell for automation.
Integrated hybrid cloud features for easier integration with Azure.

Limitations

The new Metro-style interface was a change from previous versions and not preferred by all administrators.
Some features required additional configuration and learning curve.
Like any complex OS, requires proper planning and maintenance.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare