UltraSearch vs DocFetcher

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

UltraSearch icon

UltraSearch

UltraSearch is a lightning-fast file search utility for Windows NTFS drives, delivering instant results without the need for background indexing. It allows users to quickly locate files and folders by name or pattern. by JAM Software GmbH

Free
Platforms: Windows
VS
DocFetcher icon

DocFetcher

DocFetcher is a robust, open-source desktop search application designed to find files based on their content across various file types on Windows, macOS, and Linux. by DocFetcher project

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

UltraSearch and DocFetcher are both powerful solutions in their space. UltraSearch offers ultrasearch is a lightning-fast file search utility for windows ntfs drives, delivering instant results without the need for background indexing. it allows users to quickly locate files and folders by name or pattern., while DocFetcher provides docfetcher is a robust, open-source desktop search application designed to find files based on their content across various file types on windows, macos, and linux.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

UltraSearch

UltraSearch

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast file search due to direct MFT access.
No background indexing required, reducing system overhead.
Provides real-time results as you type.
Supports regular expressions for complex searches.
Available as a portable application.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.

Limitations

Does not search within file content.
Primarily optimized for NTFS formatted drives.
DocFetcher

DocFetcher

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Fast and accurate search results once indexed.
Supports a wide variety of file formats for content search.
Ability to search within archive files (ZIP, RAR, 7z).
Offers advanced search options like Boolean operators and regular expressions.
Available as a portable application.
Free and open source.

Limitations

User interface is functional but lacks modern design.
Initial indexing process can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.
May occasionally encounter issues with very specific or proprietary file formats.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare