UltraSurf vs VPN Gate

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

UltraSurf icon

UltraSurf

UltraSurf is a freeware tool designed to help users bypass internet censorship and access blocked websites. It routes traffic through its own network of proxy servers, providing a degree of anonymity and enabling users to circumvent geographical restrictions and firewalls. by UltraReach

Free
Platforms: Windows Warning
Screenshots:
VS
VPN Gate icon

VPN Gate

VPN Gate is a volunteer-operated academic project offering free VPN servers worldwide, designed to bypass censorship and protect users' online privacy. It leverages the SoftEther VPN protocol and is supported by a network of public relay servers. by University of Tsukuba, Japan

Free
Platforms: Online
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

UltraSurf and VPN Gate are both powerful solutions in their space. UltraSurf offers ultrasurf is a freeware tool designed to help users bypass internet censorship and access blocked websites. it routes traffic through its own network of proxy servers, providing a degree of anonymity and enabling users to circumvent geographical restrictions and firewalls., while VPN Gate provides vpn gate is a volunteer-operated academic project offering free vpn servers worldwide, designed to bypass censorship and protect users' online privacy. it leverages the softether vpn protocol and is supported by a network of public relay servers.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

UltraSurf

UltraSurf

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Bypasses censorship effectively.
Extremely easy to use.
Requires no installation.
Free of charge.
Good for quick access to blocked sites.

Limitations

Privacy and security are often debated.
Performance can be inconsistent.
Limited to primarily HTTP traffic.
May not be effective against all types of censorship.
VPN Gate

VPN Gate

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Completely free to use.
Effective at bypassing internet censorship.
Supports multiple VPN protocols.
Large and dynamic list of server locations.
Integrates with the robust SoftEther VPN client.

Limitations

Logs are kept for research purposes.
Performance and reliability can vary significantly between servers.
Security relies on the trustworthiness of individual volunteers.
Lacks advanced features found in commercial VPNs.
User experience is functional but less polished than commercial offerings.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare