Universal Media Server vs OSMC : Which is Better?
Universal Media Server VS OSMC
Universal Media Server excels in media streaming and transcoding features, making it ideal for users needing extensive format support. In contrast, OSMC focuses on providing a lightweight, customizable media center experience built on Kodi, catering to users who prioritize add-on capabilities and a media center interface.
Universal Media Server
Pros:
- Wide format support including DLNA and UPnP
- Transcoding capabilities for various devices
- User-friendly interface
- Supports subtitles and multiple audio tracks
- Active community support
Cons:
- Less customizable than some alternatives
- May require additional setup for advanced features
- Transcoding can be resource-intensive
OSMC
Pros:
- Lightweight and efficient media center
- Built on Kodi, offering extensive add-ons and customization
- Regular updates and improvements
- Supports various streaming protocols
- Easy to install and configure
Cons:
- Limited native format support compared to Universal Media Server
- Not as robust for server-side transcoding
- Some users may find Kodi's interface complex
Compare Universal Media Server
Compare Infuse and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MediaTomb and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MiniDLNA and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Plex and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare PS3 Media Server and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Serviio and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Squire and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare TVersity and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Ushare uPnP media server and Universal Media Server and decide which is most suitable for you.