Ushare uPnP media server vs MediaTomb

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Ushare uPnP media server icon

Ushare uPnP media server

Ushare uPnP Media Server is a lightweight and open-source media server software designed to share your digital media content across your home network using the UPnP AV and DLNA protocols. It allows compatible devices, such as smart TVs, game consoles, and media players, to easily discover and stream your local audio, video, and photo files. by Benjamin Zores

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
VS
MediaTomb icon

MediaTomb

MediaTomb is a free, open-source UPnP MediaServer designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart TVs, game consoles, and other UPnP/DLNA clients.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux

Comparison Summary

Ushare uPnP media server and MediaTomb are both powerful solutions in their space. Ushare uPnP media server offers ushare upnp media server is a lightweight and open-source media server software designed to share your digital media content across your home network using the upnp av and dlna protocols. it allows compatible devices, such as smart tvs, game consoles, and media players, to easily discover and stream your local audio, video, and photo files., while MediaTomb provides mediatomb is a free, open-source upnp mediaserver designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart tvs, game consoles, and other upnp/dlna clients.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Ushare uPnP media server

Ushare uPnP media server

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Lightweight and resource-efficient
Strong compliance with DLNA/UPnP standards
Simple and straightforward to use once configured
Compatible with a wide range of devices
Open-source and free to use

Limitations

Limited advanced features (e.g., metadata, transcoding)
Configuration may require command-line or text file editing
Less visually appealing than some alternative servers
Development and updates may not be as frequent as commercial options
Transcoding support can be basic or absent depending on the build
MediaTomb

MediaTomb

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly configurable and flexible.
Open-source and free to use.
Supports dynamic media transcoding.
Lightweight and efficient with system resources.
Compatible with a wide range of DLNA/UPnP devices.

Limitations

Configuration can be complex for beginners.
User interface is functional but dated.
Active development has slowed down.
Requires a degree of technical knowledge for optimal setup.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare