VirtualBox vs VMware Fusion : Which is Better?

VirtualBox icon

VirtualBox

VirtulaBox is an open source software to run virtual systems on top of a physical system. Virtual systems are normally used for providing separate environment for each client sharing a single physical system. Developed by Oracle

License: Open Source

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Solaris

VS
VS
VMware Fusion icon

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion is a software hypervisor developed by VMware for Macintosh computers. VMware Fusion allows Intel-based Macs to run operating systems such as Microsoft Windows, Linux, NetWare, or Solaris on virtual machines, along with their Mac OS X operating system using a combination of paravirtualization, hardware virtualization and dynamic recompilation. Developed by VMware

License: Commercial

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Mac OS X

VirtualBox VS VMware Fusion

VirtualBox is a free and open-source virtualization tool that offers cross-platform compatibility and extensive community support, making it ideal for users who need flexibility. VMware Fusion, on the other hand, is a premium product optimized for macOS, providing superior performance and integration with Mac features, but at a higher cost.

VirtualBox

Pros:

  • Open-source and free to use
  • Cross-platform compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux)
  • Snapshot functionality for easy backup and restore
  • Supports a wide variety of guest operating systems
  • Extensive community support and documentation

Cons:

  • Less polished user interface compared to VMware Fusion
  • Performance may not be as high as VMware Fusion in macOS
  • Limited support for advanced features like DirectX

VMware Fusion

Pros:

  • Optimized for macOS environments
  • Better performance and integration with macOS features
  • User-friendly interface and streamlined installation process
  • Snapshots and clones for easy VM management
  • Support for DirectX and OpenGL for 3D graphics

Cons:

  • Paid software with a high price point
  • Limited support for non-Mac operating systems
  • Less community support compared to VirtualBox

Compare VirtualBox

vs
Compare BitBox and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare bochs and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Citrix XenServer and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Microsoft Hyper-V Server and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MobaLiveCD and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Parallels Desktop and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Portable Virtualbox and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Proxmox Virtual Environment and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare QEMU and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare virt-manager and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare VMware vSphere Hypervisor and VirtualBox and decide which is most suitable for you.