Virtualmin vs Froxlor

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Virtualmin icon

Virtualmin

Virtualmin is a comprehensive web hosting and cloud control panel designed for managing multiple domains and servers. Available in open-source and commercial variations, it provides a user-friendly interface for server administration tasks, website management, and application deployment. by Virtualmin, Inc.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Online BSD Self-Hosted
VS
Froxlor icon

Froxlor

Froxlor is a lightweight open-source server management panel designed for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and users running shared hosting environments. It simplifies server administration tasks from web server and DNS configuration to email and database management, offering a clean interface. by The Froxlor Team

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Self-Hosted
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Virtualmin and Froxlor are both powerful solutions in their space. Virtualmin offers virtualmin is a comprehensive web hosting and cloud control panel designed for managing multiple domains and servers. available in open-source and commercial variations, it provides a user-friendly interface for server administration tasks, website management, and application deployment., while Froxlor provides froxlor is a lightweight open-source server management panel designed for internet service providers (isps) and users running shared hosting environments. it simplifies server administration tasks from web server and dns configuration to email and database management, offering a clean interface.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Virtualmin

Virtualmin

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Comprehensive feature set for server and domain management.
Based on Webmin, providing deep system control.
Available in both free open-source and commercial versions.
Highly extensible through plugins.
Strong community support.

Limitations

User interface can feel dated compared to some modern alternatives.
Steeper learning curve for some advanced configurations.
Not natively designed for Windows environments.
Froxlor

Froxlor

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Lightweight and resource-efficient.
Free and open source.
Strong focus on ISP and reseller features.
Clean and functional user interface.
Supports multiple web servers (Apache, Nginx).

Limitations

Initial setup requires some Linux knowledge.
Fewer built-in third-party integrations compared to commercial panels.
Documentation, while good, can sometimes assume prior knowledge.
Community support can vary.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare