ASG-Remote Desktop vs PuTTY

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

ASG-Remote Desktop icon

ASG-Remote Desktop

ASG-Remote Desktop is a feature-rich application designed for managing a variety of remote systems including Windows, Citrix, Linux/UNIX, and macOS. It provides a centralized platform for accessing and controlling remote sessions via multiple protocols. by visionapp ASG

Commercial
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
PuTTY icon

PuTTY

PuTTY is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. It supports multiple network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. Its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for Windows platforms.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD PortableApps.com
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

ASG-Remote Desktop and PuTTY are both powerful solutions in their space. ASG-Remote Desktop offers asg-remote desktop is a feature-rich application designed for managing a variety of remote systems including windows, citrix, linux/unix, and macos. it provides a centralized platform for accessing and controlling remote sessions via multiple protocols., while PuTTY provides putty is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. it supports multiple network protocols, including ssh, telnet, and rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for windows platforms.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

ASG-Remote Desktop

ASG-Remote Desktop

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports multiple remote connection protocols (RDP, SSH, Telnet, VNC).
Centralized management of diverse remote systems.
Includes integrated SSH and Telnet clients.
Offers extensive configuration options.

Limitations

Can have a steeper learning curve due to extensive features.
Interface can appear complex to users accustomed to simpler tools.
PuTTY

PuTTY

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source, making it accessible and auditable.
Robust and reliable SSH implementation for secure connections.
Highly configurable, allowing extensive customization of appearance and behavior.
Lightweight and portable, requiring minimal resources and no installation.
Supports multiple protocols (SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, Serial, Raw).
Basic but effective session management for saving connection details.

Limitations

User interface is functional but can appear outdated and less intuitive to new users.
File transfer capabilities (PSCP, PSFTP) are command-line based, lacking an integrated graphical interface.
Limited advanced features compared to some modern, commercial terminal clients.
Configuration options, while extensive, are presented in a less visually organized manner.
Doesn't natively support tabs within a single window, requiring multiple PuTTY instances for concurrent sessions.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare