VPN Gate vs Supernet Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

VPN Gate

VPN Gate is a volunteer-operated academic project offering free VPN servers worldwide, designed to bypass censorship and protect users' online privacy. It leverages the SoftEther VPN protocol and is supported by a network of public relay servers. by University of Tsukuba, Japan

Free

Categories:

Available for:

Online

Alternatives Details Website

Supernet

Supernet is a free, security-focused VPN client designed to enhance online privacy and bypass censorship. It utilizes robust encryption and offers features like IP masking and application blocking to secure user activity. by Supernet

Free

Categories:

Available for:

Online Android Android Tablet Google Chrome Chromium Firefox

Alternatives Details Website

Summary

VPN Gate and Supernet are both powerful solutions in their space. VPN Gate offers vpn gate is a volunteer-operated academic project offering free vpn servers worldwide, designed to bypass censorship and protect users' online privacy. it leverages the softether vpn protocol and is supported by a network of public relay servers., while Supernet provides supernet is a free, security-focused vpn client designed to enhance online privacy and bypass censorship. it utilizes robust encryption and offers features like ip masking and application blocking to secure user activity.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

VPN Gate

Pros

Completely free to use.
Effective at bypassing internet censorship.
Supports multiple VPN protocols.
Large and dynamic list of server locations.
Integrates with the robust SoftEther VPN client.

Cons

Logs are kept for research purposes.
Performance and reliability can vary significantly between servers.
Security relies on the trustworthiness of individual volunteers.
Lacks advanced features found in commercial VPNs.
User experience is functional but less polished than commercial offerings.

Supernet

Pros

Focus on security and privacy features like AES256 encryption and IP masking.
Designed to bypass censorship and geographical restrictions.
Decentralized network architecture can potentially enhance resilience.
Offers granular control with features like Split Proxy and Application Blocker.
Lightweight design for efficient system resource usage.
Free to use.

Cons

Specifics of the logging policy are not provided in detail.
Performance can be inconsistent with free VPN services.
Reliability of a decentralized peer-to-peer network can vary.
The 'Wiki-like interface' description is vague and requires further clarification.
Availability of advanced features like WireGuard implementation is not explicitly confirmed.