Wireshark vs Nethogs : Which is Better?

Wireshark icon

Wireshark

Wireshark is an open source network sniffing utility to analyze network traffic.

License: Open Source

Categories: Security & Privacy

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

VS
VS
Nethogs icon

Nethogs

Nethogs is a bandwidth monitoring software. Developed by raboofje

License: Open Source

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Linux Xfce

Wireshark VS Nethogs

Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer that provides in-depth packet analysis, making it ideal for comprehensive troubleshooting and protocol dissection. In contrast, Nethogs is a lightweight tool focused on real-time monitoring of bandwidth usage per application, making it suitable for quick assessments and user-friendly for those needing basic monitoring.

Wireshark

Pros:

  • Comprehensive packet analysis
  • Supports a wide range of protocols
  • Powerful filtering and search capabilities
  • Detailed traffic visualization
  • Ability to capture live traffic from multiple interfaces
  • Extensive documentation and community support
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Advanced features for network troubleshooting
  • Ability to save and export capture files
  • Graphical user interface is intuitive for experienced users

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for beginners
  • Requires a learning curve to master advanced features
  • Resource-intensive on large captures
  • Not ideal for real-time monitoring
  • Can be complex to install on some systems
  • Requires administrative privileges for some features
  • Not as effective for live traffic analysis compared to Nethogs
  • Less focus on per-process monitoring
  • More suited for in-depth analysis than quick checks
  • Can generate large amounts of data

Nethogs

Pros:

  • Lightweight and easy to use
  • Real-time monitoring of bandwidth usage per process
  • Displays network use by application
  • Simple command-line interface for quick access
  • No need for complex setup
  • Good for quick assessments of bandwidth
  • Works well for monitoring specific processes
  • Low resource consumption
  • Installed and run quickly
  • Ideal for users who need basic monitoring

Cons:

  • Limited features compared to Wireshark
  • Lacks advanced packet analysis capabilities
  • No GUI; command-line only
  • Not suitable for protocol dissection
  • Limited filtering options
  • Less detailed reporting than Wireshark
  • Only useful for monitoring applications, not entire network
  • Not as comprehensive for network troubleshooting
  • Can miss out on low-level packet details
  • May struggle with heavy traffic

Compare Wireshark

vs
Compare apptalk.ninja and Wireshark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Ettercap and Wireshark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Intercepter-NG and Wireshark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Microsoft Network Monitor and Wireshark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare netcat and Wireshark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare tcpdump and Wireshark and decide which is most suitable for you.