ZPanel vs Sentora

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

ZPanel icon

ZPanel

ZPanel was a free, open-source web hosting control panel designed for Windows and POSIX (Linux, UNIX, and macOS) servers, offering a user-friendly interface for managing websites, domains, databases, and other hosting services. by The ZPanel project team

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Self-Hosted Discontinued
Screenshots:
VS
Sentora icon

Sentora

Sentora is a free and open-source web hosting control panel designed to simplify the management of web servers. It provides a user-friendly interface for administrators and users to control various aspects of their hosting environment, including website management, email accounts, databases, and more.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Self-Hosted

Comparison Summary

ZPanel and Sentora are both powerful solutions in their space. ZPanel offers zpanel was a free, open-source web hosting control panel designed for windows and posix (linux, unix, and macos) servers, offering a user-friendly interface for managing websites, domains, databases, and other hosting services., while Sentora provides sentora is a free and open-source web hosting control panel designed to simplify the management of web servers. it provides a user-friendly interface for administrators and users to control various aspects of their hosting environment, including website management, email accounts, databases, and more.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

ZPanel

ZPanel

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source
Cross-platform compatibility (Windows and POSIX)
User-friendly interface
Extensible via plugins

Limitations

Officially discontinued, no longer actively developed
Security vulnerabilities are likely unpatched
Community support can be inconsistent
May lack advanced features of commercial panels
Sentora

Sentora

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open source, no licensing costs.
Provides essential web hosting management features.
Extensible through a plugin system.
Clean and relatively easy-to-use interface for core tasks.
Supports Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates.

Limitations

Installation can be challenging for users without command-line experience.
Community-driven support may not be as immediate as commercial support.
May lack some advanced features found in commercial panels.
Reliability and availability of community-developed plugins can vary.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare