Dart icon

Top Alternatives to Dart

Looking for Dart alternatives? We've curated 26 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Open Source More about Dart
Platforms:
Python

Python

Open Source

Python is a versatile, high-level programming language renowned for its readability and simplicity. It supports multiple programming paradigms, including object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. It boasts a large and active community, extensive libraries, and is widely used for web development, data science, artificial intelligence, and scripting.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and read.
  • Large and active community.
  • Extensive collection of libraries.

vs Dart

Easy to learn and read. compared to Dart
Java

Java

Free

Java is a widely-used, object-oriented, general-purpose programming language designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible. Its core principle, "write once, run anywhere" (WORA), allows compiled Java code to run on any platform that supports Java without the need for recompilation.

Key Features

  • Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere)
  • Large and mature ecosystem with extensive libraries and frameworks
  • Automatic memory management (Garbage Collection)

vs Dart

Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere) compared to Dart
JavaScript

JavaScript

Open Source

JavaScript is a versatile, high-level programming language primarily used for creating dynamic and interactive web content. It runs directly in web browsers and is a fundamental technology alongside HTML and CSS.

Key Features

  • Runs natively in all web browsers.
  • Large and active community with extensive resources.
  • Vast ecosystem of libraries and frameworks.

vs Dart

Runs natively in all web browsers. compared to Dart
C (programming language)

C is a foundational, imperative programming language renowned for its efficiency and low-level access. It serves as a bedrock for systems programming, operating systems, and performance-critical applications, providing direct control over hardware through features like manual memory management.

Key Features

  • High performance due to direct compilation to machine code.
  • Provides low-level control over memory and hardware.
  • Excellent for systems programming and embedded development.

vs Dart

High performance due to direct compilation to machine code. compared to Dart
Ruby

Ruby

Open Source

Ruby is a dynamic, open-source programming language known for its elegant syntax and focus on developer productivity. It's widely used for web development, scripting, and rapid prototyping.

Key Features

  • Elegant and readable syntax
  • High developer productivity
  • Strong ecosystem with RubyGems

vs Dart

Elegant and readable syntax compared to Dart
C#

C#

Open Source

C# is a versatile, modern, object-oriented programming language from Microsoft. It's widely used for developing Windows applications, web services, mobile apps, and games, offering a balance of power and ease of use.

Key Features

  • Strong object-oriented features.
  • Extensive and well-designed .NET class library.
  • Excellent tooling and IDE support (especially Visual Studio).

vs Dart

Strong object-oriented features. compared to Dart
Lua

Lua

Open Source

Lua is a powerful, fast, and lightweight scripting language designed for embedding in applications. It's known for its simplicity, portability, and efficiency, making it ideal for a wide range of uses from embedded systems to game development and configuration.

Key Features

  • Extremely lightweight and fast
  • Easy to embed into other applications
  • Simple and easy-to-learn syntax

vs Dart

Extremely lightweight and fast compared to Dart
Perl

Perl

Open Source

Perl is a highly-capable, feature-rich programming language with over 30 years of development. Widely used for text processing, web development, and systems administration, it is known for its power and flexibility.

Key Features

  • Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions.
  • Large and comprehensive module repository (CPAN).
  • Strong integration with the operating system shell.

vs Dart

Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions. compared to Dart
Go (Programming Language)

Go (Golang) is an open-source, statically typed, compiled programming language designed at Google. Known for its concurrency primitives, garbage collection, and focus on simplicity, Go is well-suited for building scalable, high-performance applications, particularly in networking, cloud services, and microservices.

Key Features

  • Excellent concurrency support with goroutines and channels.
  • Fast compilation times lead to rapid development cycles.
  • Efficient garbage collection simplifies memory management.

vs Dart

Excellent concurrency support with goroutines and channels. compared to Dart
CoffeeScript

CoffeeScript

Open Source

CoffeeScript is a concise and elegant programming language that compiles into JavaScript, enhancing readability and brevity through syntactic sugar inspired by Ruby, Python, and Haskell.

Key Features

  • More concise and readable code compared to traditional JavaScript.
  • Faster development time due to reduced boilerplate.
  • Seamless interoperability with existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks.

vs Dart

More concise and readable code compared to traditional JavaScript. compared to Dart
Scala

Scala

Open Source

Scala is a powerful, general-purpose programming language designed to combine the best features of object-oriented and functional programming paradigms.

Key Features

  • Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming.
  • Strong static type system catches errors early.
  • Seamless interoperability with Java and the JVM ecosystem.

vs Dart

Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming. compared to Dart
Haskell

Haskell

Open Source

Haskell is a powerful, statically typed, purely functional programming language. It emphasizes immutability and mathematical purity, leading to robust and maintainable code. Ideal for applications demanding correctness and concurrency.

Key Features

  • High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity.
  • Excellent support for concurrency and parallelism.
  • More maintainable code due to immutability and functional paradigm.

vs Dart

High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity. compared to Dart
Haxe

Haxe

Open Source

Haxe is a versatile open-source programming language and compiler that lets developers write code once and deploy it across numerous platforms, including web (JavaScript, Node.js), mobile (iOS, Android), desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), servers, and even game consoles.

Key Features

  • Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase.
  • Strong static typing improves code reliability.
  • Powerful macro system for advanced code generation.

vs Dart

Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase. compared to Dart
Objective-C

Objective-C

Open Source

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
  • Powerful object-oriented features.
  • Seamless interoperability with C code.

vs Dart

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks. compared to Dart
Erlang

Erlang

Open Source

Erlang is a powerful functional programming language designed for building highly available, scalable, and fault-tolerant soft real-time systems. It excels in concurrent and distributed environments, making it ideal for applications requiring continuous uptime and handling vast amounts of concurrent requests.

Key Features

  • Excellent for building highly concurrent and distributed applications.
  • Superior fault tolerance and resilience built into the language.
  • Allows for high availability through hot code swapping.

vs Dart

Excellent for building highly concurrent and distributed applications. compared to Dart
Apple Swift

Apple Swift

Open Source

Swift is a powerful and intuitive compiled programming language from Apple, building on the best of C and Objective-C without the constraints of C compatibility. It's designed for safety, performance, and modern software design patterns, enabling developers to create apps for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and beyond.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors.
  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax improves readability and maintainability.

vs Dart

Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors. compared to Dart
FreeBASIC

FreeBASIC

Open Source

FreeBASIC is a free and open-source multiplatform BASIC compiler. It supports a wide range of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS (via third-party ports), facilitating cross-platform development. It's designed to be highly compatible with QuickBASIC while offering numerous modern features like object-oriented programming, manual memory management, and support for graphics and sound libraries, making it suitable for various programming tasks from system utilities to game development.

Key Features

  • High compatibility with QuickBASIC.
  • Generates efficient native executables.
  • Supports modern programming paradigms.

vs Dart

High compatibility with QuickBASIC. compared to Dart
Jython

Jython

Open Source

Jython is a Python implementation designed to run on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It allows Python developers to leverage Java libraries and frameworks, and Java developers to integrate Python scripting into their applications, bridging the gap between the two ecosystems.

Key Features

  • Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks.
  • Allows embedding Python into Java applications.
  • Cross-platform compatibility due to running on the JVM.

vs Dart

Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks. compared to Dart
Tcl

Tcl

Open Source

Tcl (Tool Command Language) is a dynamic, high-level scripting language ideal for rapid application development, scripting, and automation, particularly strong in graphical user interfaces.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting.
  • Integrated and powerful Tk toolkit for GUI development.
  • Excellent cross-platform compatibility.

vs Dart

Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting. compared to Dart
REBOL

REBOL

Free

REBOL is a lightweight, cross-platform language designed for data exchange, networking, and distributed computing. It's known for its expressive syntax and focus on dialects for various tasks, making it suitable for scripting and building domain-specific applications.

Key Features

  • Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures.
  • Expressive and concise syntax for rapid development.
  • Excellent for data parsing, manipulation, and exchange.

vs Dart

Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures. compared to Dart
Kotlin

Kotlin

Open Source

Kotlin is a modern, statically-typed programming language developed by JetBrains. It runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), Android, and the web (via JavaScript), and can compile to native code. Designed for concise, safe, and interoperable code, Kotlin aims to make programming more enjoyable and productive.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors.
  • More concise and expressive syntax compared to Java, leading to faster development and improved readability.
  • Excellent interoperability with Java, allowing smooth integration into existing projects.

vs Dart

Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors. compared to Dart
F# (programming language)

F# is an open-source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language designed for conciseness and correctness. It integrates seamlessly with the .NET ecosystem, making it ideal for data science, web development, and more.

Key Features

  • Concise and expressive syntax.
  • Strong static typing with excellent type inference.
  • Seamless integration with the .NET ecosystem and libraries.

vs Dart

Concise and expressive syntax. compared to Dart
Nim (programming language)

Nim is a modern, statically typed, compiled programming language emphasizing efficiency, expressiveness, and flexibility. It draws inspiration from languages like Python, Pascal, and C++, making it approachable for developers while offering low-level control for systems programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax enhances readability and productivity.
  • Strong static typing catches errors early.

vs Dart

Excellent performance due to compilation to native code. compared to Dart
Hack

Hack

Open Source

Hack is a programming language for the HipHop Virtual Machine (HHVM), combining the fast development cycle of dynamically typed languages with the discipline of static typing. It offers features like type hinting and asynchronous programming primitives, making it suitable for building complex, performant web applications.

Key Features

  • Improved performance through HHVM.
  • Early error detection with static typing.
  • Supports asynchronous programming for better responsiveness.

vs Dart

Improved performance through HHVM. compared to Dart
LiveScript

LiveScript

Open Source

LiveScript is a functional programming language that compiles directly to JavaScript, offering a more expressive syntax and advanced features like pattern matching and macros for streamlined web development.

Key Features

  • More concise and expressive syntax than JavaScript.
  • Powerful pattern matching capabilities.
  • Macros for metaprogramming and code generation.

vs Dart

More concise and expressive syntax than JavaScript. compared to Dart
Squirrel (programming language)

Squirrel is a high-level, imperative and object-oriented programming language designed for embedding in applications.

Key Features

  • Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API.
  • Lightweight and has a small memory footprint.
  • Generally good performance due to bytecode compilation.

vs Dart

Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API. compared to Dart

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Dart stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare