GitLab icon

Top Alternatives to GitLab

Looking for GitLab alternatives? We've curated 19 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

GitHub

GitHub

Freemium

GitHub is the leading web-based platform for version control and collaboration, built around the Git version control system. It empowers developers and teams to host, manage, and review code, track issues, and build software together in an efficient and transparent manner.

Key Features

  • Industry-leading platform for version control.
  • Excellent collaboration features like pull requests and code review.
  • Comprehensive issue tracking and project management capabilities.

vs GitLab

Industry-leading platform for version control. compared to GitLab
Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Freemium

Bitbucket is a web-based platform offering source code management and collaboration tools for development teams. It supports Git and Mercurial, providing hosting, version control, and features like code review and issue tracking.

Key Features

  • Strong support for both Git and Mercurial.
  • Excellent integration with Jira and other Atlassian products.
  • Unlimited private repositories for small teams on the free plan.

vs GitLab

Strong support for both Git and Mercurial. compared to GitLab
SourceForge

SourceForge is a comprehensive platform providing open-source software developers with integrated tools for version control, issue tracking, project management, and collaboration. It serves as a central hub for hosting and managing FOSS projects.

Key Features

  • Free for open-source projects
  • Supports multiple version control systems (Git, SVN, Mercurial, CVS)
  • Integrated tools for development, project management, and community

vs GitLab

Free for open-source projects compared to GitLab
JIRA

JIRA

Commercial

Jira, developed by Atlassian, is a leading issue and project tracking software primarily used by software development teams. It offers flexible workflows, powerful reporting, and seamless integration with other development tools, making it ideal for agile methodologies like Scrum and Kanban.

Key Features

  • Excellent for Agile development with strong Scrum and Kanban support.
  • Highly customizable workflows adapt to unique team processes.
  • Extensive integration options with other tools and services.

vs GitLab

Excellent for Agile development with strong Scrum and Kanban support. compared to GitLab
Trac

Trac

Open Source

Trac is a mature open-source, web-based project management and bug tracking system. It integrates closely with version control systems and provides a wiki for documentation, making it a comprehensive tool for software development teams.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with Version Control Systems (Git, SVN).
  • Powerful integrated Wiki for documentation.
  • Highly customizable through plugins and configuration.

vs GitLab

Excellent integration with Version Control Systems (Git, SVN). compared to GitLab
Launchpad

Launchpad

Open Source

Launchpad is a comprehensive platform designed for developing, managing, and maintaining software projects, with a strong emphasis on open-source collaboration. It provides tools for code hosting, bug tracking, code review, localization, and project management, fostering a vibrant community around software development.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive suite for open-source development.
  • Integrated bug tracking and code hosting.
  • Excellent localization support.

vs GitLab

Comprehensive suite for open-source development. compared to GitLab
Google Code Hosting

Google Code Hosting, also known as Project Hosting on Google Code, was a web-based service provided by Google for software development projects. It primarily offered hosting for open-source projects, providing tools for version control, issue tracking, and collaboration.

Key Features

  • Free hosting service
  • Integrated version control and issue tracking
  • Simple and functional interface

vs GitLab

Free hosting service compared to GitLab
Gogs (Go Git Service)

Gogs (Go Git Service)

Open Source

Gogs (Go Git Service) is a lightweight, self-hosted Git service designed for ease of installation and minimal resource consumption. It provides a user-friendly web interface for managing Git repositories with features like code review, issue tracking, and user management, making it an ideal choice for small teams and developers looking for a simple yet functional Git server.

Key Features

  • Extremely easy to install and configure.
  • Very lightweight and efficient on resources.
  • Simple and intuitive web interface.

vs GitLab

Extremely easy to install and configure. compared to GitLab
Buddy

Buddy

Freemium

Buddy is a powerful yet simple Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) platform designed to help developers build, test, and deploy applications with ease. Its user-friendly interface and extensive integrations make automating development workflows straightforward, from code commit to production deployment.

Key Features

  • Extremely easy to use with visual pipeline editor.
  • Fast build and deployment times.
  • Wide range of integrations with popular services.

vs GitLab

Extremely easy to use with visual pipeline editor. compared to GitLab
Phabricator

Phabricator

Open Source

Phabricator is a comprehensive, web-based suite of tools designed to streamline software development workflows. It integrates code review, task management, bug tracking, internal documentation, and repository hosting into a single platform.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive suite of integrated development tools.
  • Strong code review capabilities with rich diff and commenting.
  • Supports Git, Mercurial, and SVN out-of-the-box.

vs GitLab

Comprehensive suite of integrated development tools. compared to GitLab
Kallithea

Kallithea

Open Source

Kallithea is a free and open-source source code management system designed to provide collaborative version control for both Mercurial and Git repositories. It offers robust features for hosting, managing, and reviewing code within a team environment.

Key Features

  • Supports both Git and Mercurial concurrently.
  • Free and open-source with no licensing costs.
  • Provides granular access control.

vs GitLab

Supports both Git and Mercurial concurrently. compared to GitLab
GitBucket

GitBucket

Freemium

GitBucket is an open-source, self-hosted Git platform built with Scala. It provides a user-friendly web interface for repository management, collaboration tools, and integration capabilities for teams looking for a lightweight alternative to larger platforms.

Key Features

  • Lightweight and performant.
  • Easy to install and maintain.
  • Provides core Git hosting and collaboration features.

vs GitLab

Lightweight and performant. compared to GitLab
RhodeCode

RhodeCode

Freemium

RhodeCode is a self-hosted platform designed for secure, behind-the-firewall source code management. It provides comprehensive support for Git and Mercurial repositories, offering a robust solution for teams requiring control over their development infrastructure.

Key Features

  • Supports both Git and Mercurial in a single platform.
  • Self-hosted for enhanced security and control.
  • Offers unlimited private repositories.

vs GitLab

Supports both Git and Mercurial in a single platform. compared to GitLab
Tuleap Open ALM

Tuleap Open ALM

Open Source

Tuleap Open ALM is a comprehensive open-source platform designed for agile project management and software development teams. It integrates various tools like Git, Kanban, Scrum, and issue tracking into a single, unified environment.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive suite of ALM tools in one platform.
  • Strong support for agile methodologies (Scrum and Kanban).
  • Deep integration with Git for SCM.

vs GitLab

Comprehensive suite of ALM tools in one platform. compared to GitLab
Unfuddle

Unfuddle

Commercial

Unfuddle is a comprehensive platform for agile software development teams, offering integrated tools for bug and issue tracking, Git and Subversion hosting, and team collaboration. It provides a centralized environment to manage the entire development lifecycle.

Key Features

  • Integrated platform for version control, issue tracking, and collaboration.
  • Supports both Git and Subversion.
  • Features specifically designed for agile development teams.

vs GitLab

Integrated platform for version control, issue tracking, and collaboration. compared to GitLab
Gitblit

Gitblit

Open Source

Gitblit is an open-source, pure Java stack designed for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It offers a lightweight yet powerful platform with a web interface for collaboration and project management.

Key Features

  • Pure Java, highly portable and easy to deploy.
  • Lightweight with low resource requirements.
  • Unlimited private repositories.

vs GitLab

Pure Java, highly portable and easy to deploy. compared to GitLab
Gitweb

Gitweb

Open Source

Gitweb is a simple and lightweight web interface for browsing Git repositories. Written in Perl, it provides a browsable view of commits, files, and project activity, making it easy to explore repository history and content directly through a web browser. It’s ideal for developers who need a quick and easy way to share read-only access to their Git projects.

Key Features

  • Simple and easy to set up for basic browsing.
  • Lightweight and efficient, minimal resource usage.
  • Directly reads from Git repositories for real-time data.

vs GitLab

Simple and easy to set up for basic browsing. compared to GitLab
BountySource

BountySource is a leading platform connecting developers with projects and funding through open source bounties and crowdfunding. It enables users to place financial incentives on specific tasks within open source projects, facilitating development and rewarding contributors for their work.

Key Features

  • Directly links funding to specific open source issues.
  • Offers multiple funding methods (bounties, crowdfunding, donations).
  • Integrates with popular Git hosting platforms like GitHub and GitLab.

vs GitLab

Directly links funding to specific open source issues. compared to GitLab
GitPrep

GitPrep

Open Source

GitPrep is a portable, self-hosted GitHub clone designed for managing Git repositories with features like forking, code review, and wiki support. It offers unlimited private repositories and integrates with various development tools.

Key Features

  • Portable and easy to deploy on various infrastructure.
  • Offers unlimited private repositories.
  • Includes essential collaboration features like forking and code review.

vs GitLab

Portable and easy to deploy on various infrastructure. compared to GitLab

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how GitLab stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare