Kotlin icon

Top Alternatives to Kotlin

Looking for Kotlin alternatives? We've curated 17 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Categories:
Platforms:
Python

Python

Open Source

Python is a versatile, high-level programming language renowned for its readability and simplicity. It supports multiple programming paradigms, including object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. It boasts a large and active community, extensive libraries, and is widely used for web development, data science, artificial intelligence, and scripting.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and read.
  • Large and active community.
  • Extensive collection of libraries.

vs Kotlin

Easy to learn and read. compared to Kotlin
Java

Java

Free

Java is a widely-used, object-oriented, general-purpose programming language designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible. Its core principle, "write once, run anywhere" (WORA), allows compiled Java code to run on any platform that supports Java without the need for recompilation.

Key Features

  • Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere)
  • Large and mature ecosystem with extensive libraries and frameworks
  • Automatic memory management (Garbage Collection)

vs Kotlin

Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere) compared to Kotlin
JavaScript

JavaScript

Open Source

JavaScript is a versatile, high-level programming language primarily used for creating dynamic and interactive web content. It runs directly in web browsers and is a fundamental technology alongside HTML and CSS.

Key Features

  • Runs natively in all web browsers.
  • Large and active community with extensive resources.
  • Vast ecosystem of libraries and frameworks.

vs Kotlin

Runs natively in all web browsers. compared to Kotlin
Ruby

Ruby

Open Source

Ruby is a dynamic, open-source programming language known for its elegant syntax and focus on developer productivity. It's widely used for web development, scripting, and rapid prototyping.

Key Features

  • Elegant and readable syntax
  • High developer productivity
  • Strong ecosystem with RubyGems

vs Kotlin

Elegant and readable syntax compared to Kotlin
C#

C#

Open Source

C# is a versatile, modern, object-oriented programming language from Microsoft. It's widely used for developing Windows applications, web services, mobile apps, and games, offering a balance of power and ease of use.

Key Features

  • Strong object-oriented features.
  • Extensive and well-designed .NET class library.
  • Excellent tooling and IDE support (especially Visual Studio).

vs Kotlin

Strong object-oriented features. compared to Kotlin
Perl

Perl

Open Source

Perl is a highly-capable, feature-rich programming language with over 30 years of development. Widely used for text processing, web development, and systems administration, it is known for its power and flexibility.

Key Features

  • Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions.
  • Large and comprehensive module repository (CPAN).
  • Strong integration with the operating system shell.

vs Kotlin

Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions. compared to Kotlin
CoffeeScript

CoffeeScript

Open Source

CoffeeScript is a concise and elegant programming language that compiles into JavaScript, enhancing readability and brevity through syntactic sugar inspired by Ruby, Python, and Haskell.

Key Features

  • More concise and readable code compared to traditional JavaScript.
  • Faster development time due to reduced boilerplate.
  • Seamless interoperability with existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks.

vs Kotlin

More concise and readable code compared to traditional JavaScript. compared to Kotlin
Scala

Scala

Open Source

Scala is a powerful, general-purpose programming language designed to combine the best features of object-oriented and functional programming paradigms.

Key Features

  • Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming.
  • Strong static type system catches errors early.
  • Seamless interoperability with Java and the JVM ecosystem.

vs Kotlin

Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming. compared to Kotlin
Haskell

Haskell

Open Source

Haskell is a powerful, statically typed, purely functional programming language. It emphasizes immutability and mathematical purity, leading to robust and maintainable code. Ideal for applications demanding correctness and concurrency.

Key Features

  • High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity.
  • Excellent support for concurrency and parallelism.
  • More maintainable code due to immutability and functional paradigm.

vs Kotlin

High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity. compared to Kotlin
Objective-C

Objective-C

Open Source

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
  • Powerful object-oriented features.
  • Seamless interoperability with C code.

vs Kotlin

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks. compared to Kotlin
Groovy

Groovy

Open Source

Apache Groovy is a powerful, optionally typed and dynamic language for the Java platform. It seamlessly integrates with existing Java code and libraries, making it a versatile tool for scripting, application development, testing, and automation.

Key Features

  • Seamless interoperability with Java.
  • More concise and expressive syntax than Java.
  • Supports both dynamic and static typing.

vs Kotlin

Seamless interoperability with Java. compared to Kotlin
Apple Swift

Apple Swift

Open Source

Swift is a powerful and intuitive compiled programming language from Apple, building on the best of C and Objective-C without the constraints of C compatibility. It's designed for safety, performance, and modern software design patterns, enabling developers to create apps for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and beyond.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors.
  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax improves readability and maintainability.

vs Kotlin

Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors. compared to Kotlin
Clojure

Clojure

Open Source

Clojure is a dynamic, functional dialect of the Lisp programming language on the Java virtual machine (JVM). It emphasizes immutability and persistent data structures for robust concurrent programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent support for concurrent programming due to immutability and built-in features.
  • Runs on the JVM, providing access to a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools.
  • Powerful macro system allows for highly expressive and extensible code.

vs Kotlin

Excellent support for concurrent programming due to immutability and built-in features. compared to Kotlin
Jython

Jython

Open Source

Jython is a Python implementation designed to run on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It allows Python developers to leverage Java libraries and frameworks, and Java developers to integrate Python scripting into their applications, bridging the gap between the two ecosystems.

Key Features

  • Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks.
  • Allows embedding Python into Java applications.
  • Cross-platform compatibility due to running on the JVM.

vs Kotlin

Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks. compared to Kotlin
F# (programming language)

F# is an open-source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language designed for conciseness and correctness. It integrates seamlessly with the .NET ecosystem, making it ideal for data science, web development, and more.

Key Features

  • Concise and expressive syntax.
  • Strong static typing with excellent type inference.
  • Seamless integration with the .NET ecosystem and libraries.

vs Kotlin

Concise and expressive syntax. compared to Kotlin
Nim (programming language)

Nim is a modern, statically typed, compiled programming language emphasizing efficiency, expressiveness, and flexibility. It draws inspiration from languages like Python, Pascal, and C++, making it approachable for developers while offering low-level control for systems programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax enhances readability and productivity.
  • Strong static typing catches errors early.

vs Kotlin

Excellent performance due to compilation to native code. compared to Kotlin
LiveScript

LiveScript

Open Source

LiveScript is a functional programming language that compiles directly to JavaScript, offering a more expressive syntax and advanced features like pattern matching and macros for streamlined web development.

Key Features

  • More concise and expressive syntax than JavaScript.
  • Powerful pattern matching capabilities.
  • Macros for metaprogramming and code generation.

vs Kotlin

More concise and expressive syntax than JavaScript. compared to Kotlin

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Kotlin stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare