Kotlin icon

Top Alternatives to Kotlin

Looking for Kotlin alternatives? We've curated 18 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Categories:
Platforms:
Python

Python

Open Source

Python is a versatile, high-level programming language renowned for its readability and simplicity. It supports multiple programming paradigms, including object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. It boasts a large and active community, extensive libraries, and is widely used for web development, data science, artificial intelligence, and scripting.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and read.
  • Large and active community.
  • Extensive collection of libraries.

vs Kotlin

Easy to learn and read. compared to Kotlin
Java

Java

Free

Java is a widely-used, object-oriented, general-purpose programming language designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible. Its core principle, "write once, run anywhere" (WORA), allows compiled Java code to run on any platform that supports Java without the need for recompilation.

Key Features

  • Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere)
  • Large and mature ecosystem with extensive libraries and frameworks
  • Automatic memory management (Garbage Collection)

vs Kotlin

Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere) compared to Kotlin
JavaScript

JavaScript

Open Source

JavaScript is a versatile, high-level programming language primarily used for creating dynamic and interactive web content. It runs directly in web browsers and is a fundamental technology alongside HTML and CSS.

Key Features

  • Runs natively in all web browsers.
  • Large and active community with extensive resources.
  • Vast ecosystem of libraries and frameworks.

vs Kotlin

Runs natively in all web browsers. compared to Kotlin
Ruby

Ruby

Open Source

Ruby is a dynamic, open-source programming language known for its elegant syntax and focus on developer productivity. It's widely used for web development, scripting, and rapid prototyping.

Key Features

  • Elegant and readable syntax
  • High developer productivity
  • Strong ecosystem with RubyGems

vs Kotlin

Elegant and readable syntax compared to Kotlin
C#

C#

Open Source

C# is a versatile, modern, object-oriented programming language from Microsoft. It's widely used for developing Windows applications, web services, mobile apps, and games, offering a balance of power and ease of use.

Key Features

  • Strong object-oriented features.
  • Extensive and well-designed .NET class library.
  • Excellent tooling and IDE support (especially Visual Studio).

vs Kotlin

Strong object-oriented features. compared to Kotlin
Lua

Lua

Open Source

Lua is a powerful, fast, and lightweight scripting language designed for embedding in applications. It's known for its simplicity, portability, and efficiency, making it ideal for a wide range of uses from embedded systems to game development and configuration.

Key Features

  • Extremely lightweight and fast
  • Easy to embed into other applications
  • Simple and easy-to-learn syntax

vs Kotlin

Extremely lightweight and fast compared to Kotlin
Perl

Perl

Open Source

Perl is a highly-capable, feature-rich programming language with over 30 years of development. Widely used for text processing, web development, and systems administration, it is known for its power and flexibility.

Key Features

  • Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions.
  • Large and comprehensive module repository (CPAN).
  • Strong integration with the operating system shell.

vs Kotlin

Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions. compared to Kotlin
CoffeeScript

CoffeeScript

Open Source

CoffeeScript is a concise and elegant programming language that compiles into JavaScript, enhancing readability and brevity through syntactic sugar inspired by Ruby, Python, and Haskell.

Key Features

  • More concise and readable code compared to traditional JavaScript.
  • Faster development time due to reduced boilerplate.
  • Seamless interoperability with existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks.

vs Kotlin

More concise and readable code compared to traditional JavaScript. compared to Kotlin
Dart

Dart

Open Source

Dart is an open-source, client-optimized programming language for building fast apps on any platform. It offers a productive development experience and high performance.

Key Features

  • Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter.
  • Strong tooling and features like hot-reload boost developer productivity.
  • Flexible compilation to native code or JavaScript for performance and reach.

vs Kotlin

Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter. compared to Kotlin
Scala

Scala

Open Source

Scala is a powerful, general-purpose programming language designed to combine the best features of object-oriented and functional programming paradigms.

Key Features

  • Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming.
  • Strong static type system catches errors early.
  • Seamless interoperability with Java and the JVM ecosystem.

vs Kotlin

Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming. compared to Kotlin
Haskell

Haskell

Open Source

Haskell is a powerful, statically typed, purely functional programming language. It emphasizes immutability and mathematical purity, leading to robust and maintainable code. Ideal for applications demanding correctness and concurrency.

Key Features

  • High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity.
  • Excellent support for concurrency and parallelism.
  • More maintainable code due to immutability and functional paradigm.

vs Kotlin

High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity. compared to Kotlin
Typescript

Typescript

Open Source

TypeScript is a robust, open-source programming language developed by Microsoft. It's a superset of JavaScript, meaning it builds upon JavaScript by adding optional static typing. This enhancement is designed to improve code quality and maintainability, particularly for large, complex applications and enterprise-scale projects, making development more efficient and less prone to errors.

Key Features

  • Improved Code Quality with Static Typing
  • Enhanced Developer Tooling and Productivity
  • Better Scalability and Maintainability for Large Projects

vs Kotlin

Improved Code Quality with Static Typing compared to Kotlin
Objective-C

Objective-C

Open Source

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
  • Powerful object-oriented features.
  • Seamless interoperability with C code.

vs Kotlin

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks. compared to Kotlin
Groovy

Groovy

Open Source

Apache Groovy is a powerful, optionally typed and dynamic language for the Java platform. It seamlessly integrates with existing Java code and libraries, making it a versatile tool for scripting, application development, testing, and automation.

Key Features

  • Seamless interoperability with Java.
  • More concise and expressive syntax than Java.
  • Supports both dynamic and static typing.

vs Kotlin

Seamless interoperability with Java. compared to Kotlin
Apple Swift

Apple Swift

Open Source

Swift is a powerful and intuitive compiled programming language from Apple, building on the best of C and Objective-C without the constraints of C compatibility. It's designed for safety, performance, and modern software design patterns, enabling developers to create apps for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and beyond.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors.
  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax improves readability and maintainability.

vs Kotlin

Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors. compared to Kotlin
jRuby

jRuby

Open Source

JRuby is a robust implementation of the Ruby programming language built on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It provides seamless interoperability between Ruby and Java, allowing developers to leverage the strengths of both ecosystems.

Key Features

  • Seamless interoperability with Java.
  • Access to the vast Java library ecosystem.
  • Benefits from JVM performance optimizations (JIT compilation, garbage collection).

vs Kotlin

Seamless interoperability with Java. compared to Kotlin
Nim (programming language)

Nim is a modern, statically typed, compiled programming language emphasizing efficiency, expressiveness, and flexibility. It draws inspiration from languages like Python, Pascal, and C++, making it approachable for developers while offering low-level control for systems programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax enhances readability and productivity.
  • Strong static typing catches errors early.

vs Kotlin

Excellent performance due to compilation to native code. compared to Kotlin
LiveScript

LiveScript

Open Source

LiveScript is a functional programming language that compiles directly to JavaScript, offering a more expressive syntax and advanced features like pattern matching and macros for streamlined web development.

Key Features

  • More concise and expressive syntax than JavaScript.
  • Powerful pattern matching capabilities.
  • Macros for metaprogramming and code generation.

vs Kotlin

More concise and expressive syntax than JavaScript. compared to Kotlin

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Kotlin stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare